MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7106503055 · doi:10.25932/publishup-69057

Past and future dynamics of boreal forests in Siberia and North America derived by population genetics and individual-based modelling

2025· article· en· W7106503055 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revuepublish.UP (University of Potsdam) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic diversity and population structure
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Mots-clésTaigaGlacial periodBorealPopulationRange (aeronautics)Last Glacial MaximumLarchClimate change

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Understanding the historical and ecological drivers of boreal forest dynamics is essential for predicting species-specific responses to ongoing climate change. This thesis integrates landscape genetics, palaeobotanical evidence, and individual-based modelling to examine how glacial legacies, refugial histories, and ecological constraints have shaped the postglacial recolonisation and future migration potential of dominant boreal tree species – Larix spp. in Siberia and Picea spp. in North America. First, we investigated the demographic impacts of Quaternary glacial cycles (Hypothesis 1). Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), derived by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), combined with Bayesian demographic inference, revealed contrasting trajectories between Larix and Picea. In Larix, genetic diversity was shaped by geographic isolation, topographic barriers, and repeated Pleistocene range contractions. Effective population size closely tracked glacial–interglacial temperature oscillations, highlighting strong climate-driven demographic sensitivity. Divergence between Larix cajanderi and L. gmelinii began during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ~ 20 ka BP), likely due to range contraction and reduced gene flow across the north–south-oriented Verkhoyansk Mountains, followed by secondary contact and interbreeding in the mid-Holocene (~ 5 ka BP) as conditions improved. In North America – where, unlike Siberia, much of the boreal zone was glaciated – ice sheets strongly influenced Picea population structure. In Picea mariana, genetic patterns indicate divergence predating the LGM, with long-term isolation maintaining separation between eastern and western lineages, divided by the Laurentide and Cordilleran Ice Sheets. In contrast, P. glauca exhibits high genetic connectivity, consistent with a more recent and widespread postglacial recolonisation, limited mainly by the Alaskan Coastal Range. Second, we assessed the role of glacial refugia in shaping genetic diversity and recolonisation dynamics (Hypothesis 2). In Larix, Bayesian clustering, Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) modelling, and palaeobotanical data support long-term persistence in cryptic northern refugia, such as the Verkhoyansk Mountains and Tschuch’ye Lake region. Rather than a complete northward recolonisation from southern populations, Holocene expansion seems to have benefitted from these refugial populations ahead of the treeline. In contrast to early-Holocene dynamics, however, current migration is likely to be slower, due to the absence of extant refugia in the far north. The two Picea species show divergent refugial histories. In P. mariana, genetic data suggest survival in multiple refugia east and west of the major ice sheets, with limited postglacial gene flow. Recolonisation of Alaska–Yukon likely occurred via eastern ice-free corridors across the Rockies and Mackenzie Mountains. Picea glauca, by contrast, underwent rapid expansion from Beringian and/or southeastern Alaskan refugia, facilitated by high dispersal capacity andecological generalism. These divergent histories have left lasting imprints on genetic structure, connectivity, and present-day distributions. Third, we investigated how ecological constraints – particularly snow dynamics – modulate mountain treeline migration under climate change (Hypothesis 3). Using the individual-based, spatially explicit forest model LAVESI, originally developed for Larix and here adapted for Picea, we conducted multi-site sensitivity analyses in Alaska, Canada, and Russia. Migration responses were highly site-specific, shaped by local climate, wind, slope, and species traits. Counterintuitive patterns – such as accelerated migration with delayed maturation or higher seedling mortality – highlight the complexity of demographic–environmental interactions. Incorporating a snow dynamics module further revealed that snow cover duration and depth are critical constraints on seedling establishment, growth, and dispersal. Snow acted variably as a barrier or facilitator, depending on site conditions and its interaction with topography and wind, producing often non-linear treeline responses. These results underscore the importance of including fine-scale snow processes in models of northern forest dynamics to improve climate change projections. Finally, our genetic findings suggest species-specific differences in demographic resilience. Picea mariana, with its fragmented genetic structure and ecological specialisation, may be more vulnerable to climate change. In contrast, the high genetic connectivity and ecological breadth of P. glauca imply a potentially greater adaptive potential under future conditions. Collectively, this thesis demonstrates that boreal forest dynamics are shaped by the interplay of demographic history, ecological traits, landscape configuration, and climatic constraints. By integrating landscape genetics, palaeobotanical data, and process-based modelling, it provides robust support for three linked hypotheses: (1) that Pleistocene climate and geographical factors shaped genetic structure and forest migration; (2) that refugia influence genetic diversity and postglacial recolonisation; and (3) that treeline migration is modulated by ecological constraints, particularly snow conditions. These findings highlight the need to account for both historical legacies and present-day ecological limits when predicting forest migration and resilience in high-latitude and alpine environments.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,506

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,186
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuepublish.UP (University of Potsdam)Même sujetGenetic diversity and population structureTravaux en français237 207