C. S. Lewis’s Most Important Message: The Abolition of Man as Lewis’s Self-conscious Struggle for the Value of Human Persons
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the roughly sixty years since C. S. Lewis’s death, many have asked, what was the message he most wanted to convey? A decade before Lewis’s passing, Dr. James Houston asked him that very question. Lewis answered that he was fighting “reductionism.” More specifically, Houston heard C. S. Lewis to be most concerned about reduction of the value of the human person. At the time of this writing, Houston is 101 years of age, and he has kept a low profile all these years about his relationship with C. S. Lewis. From 1947 until 1954, he and Lewis were more than just passing acquaintances. In fact, Houston’s reputation as a friend of Lewis reached North America. He recalls that several American Christian scholars, including Carl Henry, Frank Gaebelien, and Clyde Kilby, asked him to introduce them to Lewis. His story is an example of those who, though lesser known to date by most Lewis researchers, had significant interactions with Lewis. Houston is the founder of Regent College in Vancouver, B. C., a graduate school in Christian studies. He is also co-founder of the C. S. Lewis Institute that started in Washington D.C. He sat for an oral history interview conducted on 2 October 2017 at his home in Vancouver, Canada, agreeing to put down his memories of Lewis for the historical record. The interview is now available at the Marion E. Wade Center at Wheaton College. Houston realizes public discussions of his memories of Lewis have been rare. In fact, the only other time he made a thorough statement of their years long association was during a talk given at the Southern California C. S. Lewis Society in 1982. 1 Still, he believes his experiences with Lewis are not only an important chapter of his own life, but valuable enough to get on the historical record as they will lead to new insights. Some environments where James Houston encountered C. S. Lewis have either not been reported by others who knew Lewis, or they were private encounters between Lewis and Houston.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».