MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7106815514 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17726920

Acalypha andringitrensis Leandri

2023· article· W7106815514 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineChemistry
ThématiqueWood and Agarwood Research
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMassifHabitatFirewoodMountain range (options)Riparian zoneEndemismProtected area

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

3. Acalypha andringitrensis Leandri Notulae Systematicae. Herbier du Muséum de Paris. Phanérogramie. Paris 10: 277 (Leandri 1942). —Type: Madagascar. Prov. Fianarantsoa: Massif of Andringitra, IV.1921, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 13640 (lecto-, designated by Montero Muñoz et al. [2018a: 108]: P [P00508596]; isolecto-, P [P00508594, P00508595]). — Former syntypes: Madagascar, ibid. loc., 1924, H. Humbert 3709 (P [P00224706, P00508591, P00508592, P00508593]); Madagascar, ibid. loc., IV.1921, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 9671 (P [P00508589, P00508590]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Figs 24A; 28B, C. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet refers to the type locality, the Andringitra massif (Madagascar), to which this species seems to be endemic. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra, and Ihorombe). Riparian forest and rupicolous vegetation. On basement rocks.Altitudinal range 1400-2000 (-2500) m (Fig. 15). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha andringitrensis is only known from the Andringitra massif, where this species appears to be a narrow endemic. Its EOO is estimated to be 98 km 2 and its AOO 20 km 2. Andringitra massif was declared as “Strict Nature Reserve” in 2007 and National Park in 1999 (Category II; Dudley 2008). This protected area has threats to the habitat such as intentional fires (for exploitation of honey or creation of new areas for cattle pasture), logging, and collection of firewood and non-timber products. Even so, the forest habitats remain in good condition, and the areas most affected are at the southeast and at the boundaries of the park (Goodman et al. 2018). According to specimen labels this species is uncommon. Acalypha andringitrensis is assessed as Critically Endangered: CR B1ab(i,iii,iv). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 12 collections. Madagascar. Boiteau, P. 2079 (K, P[P00433253, P00433254]); Gillespie, L. 10838 (MO), 10850 (MO), 10851 (MO), 10852 (CAN), 10853 (MO); Humbert, H. 3709 (G, P[P00224706, P00508591, P00508592, P00508593]); Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 9671 (P[P00508589, P00508590]), 13640 (P[P00224705, P00508594, P00508595, P00508596]); Phillipson, P.B. 5669 (MO, P[P04779844]); Rakotovao 7501-RN (P[P05547070]); Razafindrakoto 3110 (P[P05547265]). REFERENCES. — Goodman (1996: 61); Govaerts et al. (2000: 49); Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 108) as A. radula. DESCRIPTION Shrubs, evergreen, to 5 m tall, dioecious or sometimes monoecious. Branches densely pubescent with simple, short, more or less appressed trichomes and hyaline trichomes to 0.8 mm long, glabrescent when mature. Axillary buds ovoid, to 3 × 2 mm, perulate, perules 2, imbricate, chartaceous, blackish, pubescent with simple, short trichomes. Stipules to 13 mm long, elliptic to ovate-elliptic, midrib thick, margins hyaline, appressed-pubescent, especially on midrib. Petioles 1.5-8(- 12) cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches and with scattered, short, glandular trichomes. Leaf blades conspicuously bullate, 6-14 × (2-) 4-8 cm, ovate-lanceolate to ovate, subchartaceous; base cordate; apex narrowly acute to gradually acuminate, acumen to 10 mm, acute; margin serrate; teeth subacute, irregular; upper surface pubescent with simple, short, erect, trichomes on top of blisters and main veins, and scattered, short, glandular trichomes, denser on veins near base; lower surface pubescent with simple, thin trichomes, denser on veins; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3 or 5, secondary veins 6-10 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform, unisexual, axillary. Male inflorescences densely flowered, to 10 cm long; peduncle to 8 mm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches; flowers glomerate; bracts to 1 mm long, spatulate, densely hairy and ciliate with simple trichomes, and short, glandular trichomes. Female inflorescences densely flowered, becoming more open in fruit, to 8 cm long; peduncle to 10 mm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches; bracts 6-16, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 18 × 22 mm, deltoid-reniform, pubescent with simple, thin, erect, trichomes and thick, glandular trichomes to 1 mm long, and ciliate; margin dentate, teeth 25-31, triangular,, with glandular trichomes, central tooth not prominent; bracteoles triangular, to 1.5 mm long, pubescent with simple, short trichomes, and ciliate. Male flowers: pedicel to 1 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 1.5 mm diameter, sparsely hairy. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 0.8 mm long, oblong-lanceolate, sparsely hairy and ciliate; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, smooth, surface hispid with simple, short, erect trichomes and glandular trichomes; styles 3, to 5 mm long, slightly connate at base, sparsely hairy on rachis, each divided into 9-10 segments. Allomorphic flowers sometimes present at female inflorescence apex; pedicel filiform, to 20 mm long, sparsely hairy; sepals not seen; ovary not seen. Capsules to 5 mm diameter, smooth, surface sparsely hairy with simple, short, erect trichomes and glandular trichomes to 1.5 mm long. Seeds c. 3 × 2 mm, pyriform, minutely foveolate. NOTE In our previous work (Montero Muñoz et al. 2018a) we included Acalypha andringitrensis as a synonym of A. radula, according to preliminary DNA results, but we have now concluded that A. andringitrensis is a different species due to its leaf blades (3-) 4-6 cm wide, ovate-lanceolate and stipules to 13 mm long, elliptic to ovate-elliptic vs leaf blades (1.5-)2-3(-3.5) cm wide, narrowly triangular-lanceolate to linear-lanceolate and stipules to 8 mm long, triangular-lanceolate in A. radula. Furthermore, additional DNA sampling shows that the two species are reciprocally monophyletic (Levin et al. 2022).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,773
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,001
Communication savante0,0030,000
Science ouverte0,0030,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0980,124

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetWood and Agarwood ResearchTravaux en français237 207