Intimate Partner Violence Experiences of Middle Eastern Immigrant Women Living in Ottawa During the Perinatal Period
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) during the perinatal period is a significant problem for Middle Eastern immigrant women (MEIW) and requires comprehensive and culturally responsive interventions that address the underlying risk factors. Several risk factors (e.g., cultural norms, the perinatal period and language barriers) contribute to increasing women's vulnerability to IPV. Additionally, MEIW face multiple forces of oppression such as racism which are further intersected by factors associated with their immigrant status, creating a unique IPV experience that calls for a systematic investigation. However, there is limited research in this area, a critical gap in knowledge and practice which this study addresses. This study explored the experiences of IPV among MEIW living in Ottawa during the perinatal period. Theoretical Framework: This study was guided by the Intersectionality lens and the Socio-Ecological Model to explore the intersections of gender and other factors as well as the multiple layers of issues associated with IPV. Methodology: The study has two phases: phase 1, a scoping review of studies examining IPV within the context of MEIW during the perinatal period, and phase 2, an instrumental case study guided by Stake's (1995) approach to qualitative case study research. As part of Phase 2, research ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Board prior to participant recruitment. Following approval, MEIW during the perinatal period were recruited using convenience and purposeful sampling techniques. Data collection involved in-depth individual interviews with 20 participants and one focus group discussion. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically as described by Braun and Clarke (2006). The FGD served as member-checking to establish the credibility of the data. Results: Findings reveal that IPV among MEIW is not just an individual experience, but a socially embedded phenomenon influenced by patriarchal norms and systemic inequities. Five major themes were identified, 1. Defining IPV, 2. Forms of IPV, 3. IPV impact, 4. IPV vulnerabilities and help seeking behaviours, and 5. IPV coping strategies. Discussion and Implications: It synthesizes four overarching themes, underscoring the need for culturally responsive interventions that more effectively support MEIW experiencing IPV. Conclusion: This study deepens our understanding of IPV during the perinatal period for MEIW, providing insight into how cultural and systemic factors influence their experiences. The findings call for culturally responsive interventions and policies that consider the complex realities of IPV in Middle Eastern immigrant communities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».