MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108341302 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17725565

Write it Down! Fostering Responsible Reuse of Cultural Heritage Data with Interoperable Dataset Descriptions

2025· article· enc· W7108341302 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueenc
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCultural heritageInteroperabilityDocumentationTransparency (behavior)ReuseContext (archaeology)Stewardship (theology)Linked data

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Cultural heritage institutions have seen a surge in the creation of datasets ready for computational use, while researchers increasingly experiment with datasets through computational processing and AI-assisted methods. For both groups, issues of transparency have sparked interest in developing documentation practices cutting across the artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) and the digital cultural heritage (DCH) sector, aiming to provide better information on e.g., the purpose, composition, reusability, collection processes and provenance, or societal biases reflected in datasets. The publication of Datasheet for Datasets (Gebru et al., 2021) and the Collections as Data movement (Padilla et al. 2023) have sparked the definition of guidelines for dataset creators and publishers who want to follow FAIR and CARE principles and make it easier for one to reuse their data in a responsible, well-informed manner. Gathering CH professionals, technical experts and humanities scholars from the Europeana Research and EuropeanaTech communities, the Datasheets for Digital Cultural Heritage working group has adapted existing ML documentation approaches to the DCH case. As a first outcome, a template (Alkemade et al, 2023) has sought to address the complexities of DCH datasets, shaped by layered curatorial decisions, often subject to evolving and non-linear trajectories. In the spirit of the common European data space for cultural heritage (2025), which is being deployed under the stewardship of the Europeana Initiative, the working group has then supported professionals interested in applying the template in their institutional context (see for example Lehmann et al., 2024) and fostered exchanges with other initiatives emerging at the European level and exploring suitable ways to describe datasets. One key initiative in this regard concerns the proposal for Data-Envelopes for Cultural Heritage (Luthra et al., 2024), which has focused specifically on providing machine-readable descriptions of datasets, especially considering the W3C Data Catalogue Vocabulary (DCAT) that is used in many data portals. The goal of this collaboration is both to validate and further refine the existing templates following a community-led approach, and to investigate how to ensure (human-machine) interoperability in the data space, which aims to establish a diverse data offer (including datasets suitable for AI applications, as illustrated by the AI4Culture platform (2025)) as well as making use of DCAT. Our contribution will report on the following ongoing work: Alignment with DCAT: DCH datasheet fields are being mapped to DCAT to enable machine-readability Alignment between DCH datasheets and data-envelopes, establishing conceptual and structural compatibility, and supporting future integration with other legal, technical and ethical frameworks. Gathering a set of exemplary dataset descriptions Creation of (prototype) tooling to support and simplify the creation, reuse and integration of descriptions into existing workflows. We also plan to discuss new items that will begin before the conference: Identify possible connections with data research plans and data management plans. This may extend to interoperability with emerging European Cultural Heritage Cloud (ECHOES, 2025). Establish a modular structure for descriptions, aiming at operationalising the templates by defining building blocks, including a ‘core’ common to most DCH collections and a series of ‘profiles’, tailored to research data management and AI/ML workflows (e.g., AI Model Research Documentation Sheet (AIRDocS) (Oberbichler, 2025) Providing guidance to use these modules and possibly develop custom ones. While some components remain under active development (e.g. prototype, profiles and guidelines for their development), we present this work in progress to foster dialogue and invite broader engagement from the Fantastic Futures community. References AI4Culture project (2025). AI4Culture, Empowering Cultural Heritage through Artificial Intelligence. https://ai4culture.eu Alkemade, H., Claeyssens, S., Colavizza, G., Freire, N., Irollo, A., Lehmann, J., Neudecker, C., Osti, G., & van Strien, D. (2023, September 25). Datasheets for Digital Cultural Heritage Datasets—Template v.1. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/8375034 Alkemade, H., Claeyssens, S., Colavizza, G., Freire, N., Lehmann, J., Neudecker, C., Osti, G., & Van Strien, D. (2023). Datasheets for Digital Cultural Heritage Datasets. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 9, 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.124 Common European data space for cultural heritage (2025), Welcome to the Common European data space for cultural heritage. https://www.dataspace-culturalheritage.eu/en ECHOES project (2025), ECCCH, The Cultural Heritage Cloud, https://www.echoes-eccch.eu/ Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for Datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723 Luthra, M., & Eskevich, M. (2024). Data-Envelopes for Cultural Heritage: Going beyond Datasheets. In I. Siegert & K. Choukri (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal and Ethical Issues in Human Language Technologies @ LREC-COLING 2024 (pp. 52–65). ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.legal-1.9 Lehmann, J., & Schneider, S. (2024). Metadata of the "Alter Realkatalog" (ARK) of Berlin State Library (SBB). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13284442 Oberbichler, S. (2025). AI Model Research Documentation Sheet (AIRDocS). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15046713 Padilla, T., Scates Kettler, H., Varner, S., & Shorish, Y. (2023). Vancouver Statement on Collections as Data. https://zenodo.org/records/8342171 Pushkarna, M., Zaldivar, A., & Kjartansson, O. (2022). Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI. 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1776–1826. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533231 World Wide Web Consortium. (2024). Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT) - Version 3. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,139
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,252
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,139
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,733

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,1390,252
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0120,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,011
Communication savante0,0270,049
Science ouverte0,0070,051
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,167
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,128 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDigital Humanities and ScholarshipTravaux en français237 207