MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108440548 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1240

Favorable safety and therapeutic efficacy of a novel humanized anti-ADAMTS13 antibody in acquired von willebrand syndrome: A preclinical study

2025· article· en· W7108440548 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Aging
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVon Willebrand factorAntibodyTolerabilityIn vivoVon Willebrand diseaseTherapeutic effectToxicityHumanized antibodySafety pharmacology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) results from the excessive proteolytic cleavage of von Willebrand factor (VWF) by its specific protease, ADAMTS13. AVWS has been identified as a potential risk factor for bleeding in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Current management strategies for AVWS associated with MCS include VWF supplementation with fresh frozen plasma or VWF concentrate; however, the therapeutic effect is transient due to persistent VWF degradation. We developed a mouse-derived anti-ADAMTS13 antibody targeting the disintegrin-like domain of ADAMTS13 (Uemura, et al., Blood, 2005) and subsequently achieved its humanization (designated HA10) (Ito, et al., Sci Rep, 2021). In this study, we investigated HA10 as a potential therapeutic approach for AVWS mediated by excessive VWF cleavage. Aim We investigated HA10 inhibitory effect on VWF degradation in MCS-implanted male cynomolgus monkeys following single-dose HA10 administration (Efficacy pharmacological study). Additionally, we assessed the tolerability and toxicity of a single HA10 dose in male cynomolgus monkeys (toxicity study). Methods Efficacy pharmacological study: MCS circuits equipped with a MERA centrifugal pump (Senko Medical, Tokyo, Japan) were implanted in four male cynomolgus monkeys. Perfusion experiments were conducted at 3,000 rpm and the maximum flow rate maintaining stable flow (0.5–1 L/min). We evaluated temporal changes in VWF multimers in animals treated with (n = 2, 10 μg/mL) or without (n = 2) HA10 over 3 hours. VWF multimer analysis was conducted using 1.0% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-agarose gels. Toxicity studies: In a preliminary non-GLP single-dose study, HA10 was intravenously administered at 6.5 or 32.5 mg/kg to two male cynomolgus monkeys per group, targeting plasma concentrations of 100 and 500 μg/mL. Hematological and biochemical parameters were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 days post-administration. Histopathological examinations of the heart and brain were conducted on day 14. In the definitive single-dose GLP study, HA10 was intravenously administered at 3 and 25 mg/kg to three males per group. The 3 mg/kg dose was selected to sustain plasma levels above the estimated effective concentration (10 μg/mL) for approximately 1 week. The control group (n = 3) received 146 mM purified sucrose/0.05% (w/v) polysorbate 80 in PBS (-), administered identically to HA10. During the observation period, blood biochemical analyses were performed on days 1, 3, 6, and 14; necropsy and histopathological examinations were conducted on day 14. The efficacy pharmacological study and the toxicity studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Nissei Bilis Co., Ltd. and SHIN NIPPON BIOMEDICAL LABORATORIES, Ltd., respectively. Results Efficacy pharmacological study: We observed VWF degradation in untreated animals. In contrast, large VWF multimers were preserved in HA10-treated animals throughout the experiment. Toxicity studies: In the preliminary non-GLP toxicity study, no deaths occurred during the observation period, and no HA10-related abnormalities were observed in the histopathological examinations of the heart and brain. The mean HA10 concentration at 0.167 hours post-administration was 175 μg/mL in the 6.5 mg/kg group and 942 μg/mL in the 32.5 mg/kg group. The mean elimination half-life of HA10 was 64.9 hours in the 6.5 mg/kg group and 69.5 hours in the 32.5 mg/kg group. In the definitive GLP toxicity study, no mortality occurred during the study period. In the 25 mg/kg group, thrombocytopenia was observed in one animal; however, this finding was considered to have low toxicological significance, as it resolved by day 14. Additionally, elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatinine kinase were observed on days 1, 3, and 6 in this group. However, no corresponding histopathological abnormalities were observed in the affected organs or tissues, suggesting these changes had low toxicological relevance. Conclusion Studies in cynomolgus monkeys demonstrated HA10 efficacy in inhibiting VWF degradation under high shear stress conditions and established its safety profile. Although thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) represents a potentially severe complication of HA10, no TTP-associated findings were reported. Additional basic research data have been collected to further characterize HA10 preclinical safety profile.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→