MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108450376 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-6296

Pre-existing cognitive impairment is associated with reduced long-term survival following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

2025· article· en· W7108450376 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCohortProportional hazards modelLymphomaRetrospective cohort studySurvival analysisCohort studyChimeric antigen receptorSurrogate endpointCAR T-cell therapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: CAR T therapy has revolutionized treatment landscape for patients with relapsed refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), leading to long-term survival for a significant portion of patients including those with advanced age, multi-morbidity, and suboptimal performance status. However, many patients still relapse after CAR T therapy and often require additional treatments. We have previously shown in a small cohort of older patients with NHL that pre-CAR T geriatric assessment and consultation could identify prognostically important impairments in various health domains. In this retrospective study, we focus on the impact of pre-existing cognitive impairment on CAR T therapy outcomes in a larger, contemporary cohort of patients with NHL. Methods: The single instituion cohort includes patients with a diagnosis of R/R NHL after ≥1 line of therapy who received axicabtagene ciloleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, or tisagenlecleucel. CAR T therapy eligibility criteria, clinical care, and monitoring of CRS and ICANS follows standard institutional guidelines. Cognition is assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with a score < 26 out of 30 defined as impaired. Overall patient characteristics are summarized using descriptive statistics. Overall survival (OS) is defined from infusion until death or end of follow-up, whereas progression-free survival (PFS) is defined from infusion until progression, death, or end of follow-up in the absence of an event; patients who received subsequent treatment for NHL before or in absence of post-CAR T relapse are censored at next treatment start. Survival endpoints are estimated using Kaplan Meier methodology and compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models are used to evaluate univariable and multivariable associations between outcomes and baseline characteristics. The study has been approved by MSK institutional review board and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: From January 1st, 2020 to December 31st, 2024, 179 out of 375 patients receiving CAR T therapy for NHL had pre-infusion MoCA and were included in this analysis. There were no significant differences in baseline patient, disease, and treatment characteristics between the groups of patients with and without MoCA except for age and KPS as expected, since MoCA is commonly used as a part of geriatric assessment for older patients. Based on the cutoff score, sixty-eight patients (38%) were cognitively impaired while the remaining 111 were cognitively intact. There were no significant differences in baseline patient, disease, and treatment characteristics between the groups of patients with and without cogntive impairment except for history of seizure. With a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR: 12.2-31.2), cognitively intact patients had significantly superior OS compared to cognitively impaired patients (univariable HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34–0.95, p = 0.032). Importantly, we find a similar association of cognitive impairment with OS in multivariable analysis (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–0.96, p = 0.034), after adjusting for two other significant variables: LDH pre-lymphodepletion (HR for normal LDH: 0.31, 95% CI 0.18–0.52, p < 0.001) and KPS (HR for KPS ≥90: 0.48, 95% CI 0.23–0.99, p = 0.047). Cognitive impairment is not associated with PFS, non-relapse mortality (NRM), or the development of CRS or ICANS. We next examine possible mechanisms by which cognitive impairment affects survival. We find that the NRM of the overall cohort is quite low with a non-significant difference of 5 events among 68 cognitively impaired, and 6 events among 111 cognitively intact patients. Interestingly, significantly more cognitively intact patients received additional treatments post-relapse, 87%, than cognitively impaired patients, 67%. Conclusions: In this contemporary, large, single-institution cohort study, we show that pre-exisiting cognitive impairment prior to CAR T therapy is associated with significantly reduced OS independent of other well-established risk factors. While the underlying mechanism may be multifactorial, cognitive impairment, as a marker of frailty among older patients, may contribute to these patients' decreased ability to tolerate additional, post-relapse therapy. We are currently planning a multi-center validation study, and conducting a prospective, pilot interventional study to target cognitive impairment during CAR T therapy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,329
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→