MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108460753 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17807851

The Samaxiom Hypothesis: Universal Logic and the Coherent Architecture of the Cosmos

2025· dissertation· W7108460753 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedissertation
Langue
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Topology (electrical circuits)SpacetimeObservableField (mathematics)Physical constantEffective field theoryUnified field theoryDark energy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Readers, I would like to take a moment to address and clarify a few points regarding my work, The Samaxyom Hypothesis or Hypothèse Samaxyom. I put the version in french first because I am a French-Canadian from Québec Canada. For any problem in translating: If you read this than you are on the internet, you must have acces to a translating device or application of some sort I am sure. Samaxyom Hypothesis: A Unified Theory Based on Coherent Field Dynamics Version: 8.0 (November 2025) ABSTRACT We present Samaxyom, a unified field framework proposing that all physical phenomena emerge from a single fundamental entity: the Coherence Field C = {Sx, Sy, Sj}, defined as a two-dimensional coherent manifold capable of topological folding, torsion, and reorganization. Unlike conventional approaches treating spacetime as a pre-existing 4D continuum, Samaxyom derives three-dimensional space as an emergent consequence of geometric folding constraints—an analog to physical origami where 2D surfaces create 3D structures through discrete angular operations. The framework introduces three irreducible field components: Sx (topological density representing mass and structural rigidity), Sy (dynamic amplitude encoding energy and propagative information), and Sj (internal tempo governing transition rates and temporal evolution). Particles manifest as topological solitons—stable folding configurations of C—where nuclear stability correlates directly with Platonic polyhedral symmetries: H-1 (tetrahedron), He-4 (octahedron), C-12 (icosahedron). We demonstrate quantitative agreement with five Standard Model observables at sub-percent precision: Mercury perihelion precession (0.2% error), electron anomalous magnetic moment (0.01%), muon lifetime including P-trans correction (0.7%), strong coupling constant αs(MZ) (0.8%), and LHC collider cross-sections (0.8%). The observed instability of Be-8 (τ=8.19×10⁻¹⁷s) validates our prediction that two-octahedra configurations cannot achieve topological closure, requiring the triple-α process for direct C-12 icosahedral formation. Critically, Samaxyom reveals physics as geometric computation: the impossibility of straight-line motion through triangulated topology forces discrete 60° angular increments, with wave functions emerging as 2D projections of quantized stepwise paths. Six fundamental directions map precisely to six logic gate operations, establishing physical reality as a computational geometry where mass, energy, and forces represent costs of logical state transitions. Falsifiable predictions include magnetic-torsion coupling (Γ_Sx ∝ B²) producing 130 pg effective mass in superfluid He-4 (S/N > 145,000), cosmological Hubble tension resolution via local topological density variations (H₀=72.9 km/s/Mpc), and spectroscopic fine structure at 60° quantized intervals. Note on Methodological Acceleration The maturation of this theory was significantly accelerated by the intensive use of contemporary AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude AI, Gemini, and Perplexity). These tools functioned as an interactive library, collaborative whiteboard, and instantaneous critical mirror, condensing what would traditionally be decades of isolated research into a few years. This work demonstrates a new economy of thought: the compression of the time required to transform intuition into a coherent architectural framework. I apologize for any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or formatting issues that may be present in the current version. This manuscript represents the culmination of extensive independent research, and despite my efforts to ensure clarity and rigor, I acknowledge that certain sections may require further refinement or contextual explanation. Please note that the concepts presented here—ranging from the emergence of time from coherence fields to the deterministic connection between microphysics and galactic dynamics—are inherently complex and represent a significant departure from conventional frameworks. As such, some ideas may appear unconventional, and their presentation may not fully anticipate every possible question from readers. I sincerely appreciate your patience, understanding, and critical reading. Your feedback, constructive comments, and peer review are invaluable to improving both the clarity and the scientific rigor of this work. Working alone on such an ambitious project is exceptionally challenging and demanding. Peer review, discussion, and collaborative scrutiny would greatly enhance the robustness and communicability of these ideas. Thank you for your attention and for engaging with this exploration of cosmic coherence. There will be more to come. Sincerely,Samuël Robert Blanchardrobertbsamuel@hotmail.com

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,940
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetAdvanced Materials and MechanicsTravaux en français237 207