MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108505175 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-490

Correlation between treatment-emergent cytopenias and clinical response with imetelstat (IME) in patients (Pts) with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS): Analysis from the imerge Trial

2025· article· en· W7108505175 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCytopeniaMyelodysplastic syndromesNeutropeniaPost-hoc analysisAnemiaAdverse effectExact testPlaceboUnivariate analysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: IME is a first-in-class, direct, and competitive telomerase inhibitor approved for the treatment (tx) of certain adult pts with LR-MDS with red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent anemia who are relapsed or refractory to/ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. In the pivotal Phase 3 IMerge trial (NCT02598661), a significantly higher proportion of pts on IME vs placebo achieved ≥8-wk (40% vs 15%; P<.001) and ≥24-wk (28% vs 3%; P<.001) RBC transfusion independence (TI). The most common grade 3/4 tx-emergent adverse events with IME were neutropenia (68%) and thrombocytopenia (62%), typically occurring within the first 3 tx cycles and generally manageable and reversible. This post hoc analysis explored the possible association between IME-related cytopenias and Hb increase, a measure linked to RBC-TI achievement. Methods: Pooled pts from the 3 parts of IMerge (Phase 2/3 and QTc substudy) who received 7.1 mg/kg IME active dose (equivalent to 7.5 mg/kg IME sodium) were included. The relationship between percent reduction in platelet (PLT)/neutrophil (NEUT) counts occurring within the first 2 cycles of IME tx and subsequent outcomes was analyzed, including maximum (max) Hb increase from baseline (pre-tx Hb), hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) per IWG 2006 criteria (defined as Hb rise ≥1.5 g/dL lasting 8 wk), and rates of ≥8-wk and ≥24-wk RBC-TI. Cytopenia levels were dichotomized at ≥50% reduction for PLTs and ≥75% reduction for NEUTs to assess categorical correlations with HI-E and RBC-TI responses (yes/no) using Fisher exact test and t test for group differences in Hb increase. Univariate linear regression was conducted to evaluate the association between continuous percent reduction in PLT/NEUT counts and max Hb increase. Multivariate analyses were conducted via stepwise linear regression (for max Hb increase) or logistic regression (for HI-E/TI response) with dichotomized percent reduction in PLT/NEUT counts in the presence of other baseline prognostic factors. An unadjusted nominal P value from each test was reported. Results: Data cutoff dates were 10/13/2023 (Phase 2/3) and 10/13/2024 (QTc substudy); 226 pts were included. Median values at baseline were 71 y of age, pre-tx Hb 7.8 g/dL, and PLT and NEUT counts 236×109/L and 2.6×109/L, respectively. Median IME tx duration was 34 wk. Pts with ≥50% max PLT reduction within the first 2 cycles of IME tx had a significantly greater mean max Hb increase from pre-tx (2.07 g/dL [n=169] vs 1.17 g/dL [n=39]; P=.003), HI-E rate (34.2% vs 11.9%; P=.005) and ≥24-wk RBC-TI rates (32.6% vs 7.1%; P<.001), and numerically greater ≥8-wk RBC-TI rates (42.4% vs 26.2%; P=.056) vs pts with <50% PLT reduction. As a continuous variable, PLT reduction remained significantly associated with Hb increase (P=.0095; linear regression). Similarly, pts with ≥75% max NEUT reduction within the first 2 cycles of IME tx had a significantly greater mean max Hb increase from pre-tx (2.53 g/dL [n=70] vs 1.58 g/dL [n=138]; P=.011), numerically greater HI-E rate (34.6% vs 27.7%), and comparable ≥8-wk (41.0% vs 38.5%) and ≥24-wk RBC-TI rates (30.8% vs 26.4%) vs pts with <75% NEUT reduction. As a continuous variable, NEUT reduction was also significantly associated with max Hb increase (P=.012). Multivariate analyses showed that the likelihood of achieving ≥8-wk and ≥24-wk RBC-TI was significantly correlated with the max Hb increase from pre-tx, g/dL (odds ratio [OR; 95% CI], 6.47 [3.73-11.24; P<.001] and 3.87 [2.66-5.64; P<.001], respectively). Multivariate analyses further confirmed that max Hb increase, g/dL, significantly correlated with ≥75% NEUT reduction (coefficient estimate [95% CI], 0.94 [0.32-1.57; P=.003]), and the likelihood of achieving HI-E significantly correlated with ≥50% PLT reduction (OR [95% CI], 4.16 [1.54-11.23; P=.005]). Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, pts with ≥75% NEUT or ≥50% PLT reductions in the first 2 cycles of IME tx were more likely to have greater Hb increases from pre-tx or to achieve an HI-E response. The greater Hb increase from pre-tx emerged as a main driver for achieving ≥8-wk and ≥24-wk RBC-TI responses. Collectively, these data suggest that tx-emergent cytopenias with IME may be associated with potential for clinical benefit, similar to lenalidomide in del5q MDS. Further research is needed to confirm this on-target effect of IME resulting from its activity on clonal progenitor cells and subsequent recovery in blood cell production.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→