MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108514045 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5104

Associations between serum asparaginase activity and asparaginase-associated toxicities in pediatric ALL patients receiving calaspargase: A report from the DFCI ALL consortium

2025· article· en· W7108514045 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésToxicityAsparaginaseClinical trialRandomized controlled trialChemotherapyNeutropeniaLeukemiaAcute lymphocytic leukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: L-asparaginase (ASP) is a universal component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. Although highly effective, it can cause severe toxicities that may interrupt, delay, or require cessation of therapy. A serum asparaginase activity (SAA) of 0.1 IU/mL is associated with therapeutic effect; however, for several weeks after a dose of pegylated E.coli asparaginase formulations (pegaspargase or calaspargase), SAA levels exceed this threshold. With standard dosing, SAA varies between patients, with some achieving higher sustained levels than others. Some prior studies suggest that higher SAA levels may increase toxicity risk, but findings are inconsistent. Calaspargase is a relatively new formulation now standardly used in frontline therapy for childhood ALL. Whether higher SAA levels increase the risk of ASP-associated toxicities among patients receiving calaspargase has not been previously investigated. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium protocol 11-001 was a randomized Phase III trial comparing the efficacy and toxicity of calaspargase, given every 3-weeks x 10 doses to pegaspargase, given every 2-weeks x 15 doses during post-induction multiagent therapy. We evaluated whether higher nadir SAA levels (NSAA) obtained prior to each dose were associated with ASP-associated toxicities among patients receiving calaspargase. Methods: DFCI 11-001 enrolled patients 1 – 21 years with newly diagnosed ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma. For the present analysis, patients who received post-induction calaspargase and had SAA levels available for evaluation were included. Patients assigned to the calaspargase arm received this formulation at a dose of 2500 IU/m2 every 3-weeks during Consolidation II therapy; NSAA levels were obtained 3-weeks after each dose. Using individual patient-level data, a mixed linear model was used to estimate the effect of week 4 SAA (collected prior to the 2nd dose) on all subsequent SAA levels collected through Consolidation II. Models indicated that NSAA levels collected prior to the 2nd dose of calaspargase using > 75th percentile cutoff highly predicted all subsequent NSAA levels; therefore, patients with high NSAA prior to 2nd dose (defined as being > 75th percentile) were considered to have high NSAA for this analysis. ASP-associated toxicity was defined as a composite endpoint, and patients were grouped as having no toxicities or ≥1 of the following: pancreatitis (mild, moderate, severe), thromboembolic event, or ≥ grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia as defined by CTCAE v 4.0. High NSAA level after 1st dose of calaspargase was evaluated as a predictive factor for composite toxicity. Additional analyses were performed to assess if patient or disease-related factors contributed to elevated SAA levels. Results: Between 2012 and 2015, N=239 patients were enrolled on DFCI 11-001, and 119 were randomized to the calaspargase arm; N=75 of these patients were included in the present analysis. The median NSAA prior to 2nd dose of calasparagase was 0.585 IU/mL, and the range was 0.025- 0.993 IU/mL. NSAA obtained prior to the 2nd dose was at or above the 75th percentile in N=19 patients (considered high NSAA) and was below the 75th percentile in N=56. There was no association between high NSAA levels and any of the following: age (p=0.53), sex (p=0.78), body mass index [BMI] (p>0.99), body surface area [BSA] (p=0.14), leukemia immunophenotype (p>0.99) or final risk group (p>0.99). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of toxicity for patients with high NSAA levels. Specifically, 37% (N=7) of patients with high NSAA levels developed at least 1 ASP-associated toxicity, vs. 29% (N=16)of patients with NSAA levels <75th percentile (p=0.57). Similarly, there was no association between ASP-associated toxicity and age (p=0.51), sex (p=0.29), BMI (p=0.21), BSA (p=0.5), or leukemia immunophenotype (p=0.85). Conclusions: Among patients receiving calaspargase for ALL, we found no association between high NSAA levels and ASP-related toxicity; NSAA levels were also not associated with demographic or disease characteristics. These results suggest that decreasing SAA via dose reduction or capping calaspargase doses may not reduce the rate of ASP-related toxicity. While our findings warrant further exploration to determine the utility of NSAA level as a predictor of toxicity risk, other potential risk factors for, and interventions to prevent, ASP-related toxicities should also be examined.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207