MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108740836 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5459

Randomised Phase II study of acalabrutinib in combination with R-CHOP treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma confirms safety and unimpaired treatment delivery

2025· article· en· W7108740836 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensSt. Thomas Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClinical endpointDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaChemotherapy regimenProgression-free survivalInternational Prognostic IndexPhases of clinical researchSurrogate endpointChemotherapyDasatinibClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The phase Ib/II ACCEPT study (NCT03571308) assessed acalabrutinib (A), a second generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor with enhanced kinase selectivity, in combination with R-CHOP in a single arm study for patients (pts) with de novo DLBCL. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. At the recommended phase II dose of A 100mg bd, R-CHOP+A resulted in in a 95% 24-month progression-free survival (PFS). Efficacy was seen across all cell-of-origin phenotypes (COO). In older pts there was no difference in safety and no compromise of R-CHOP, in contrast to the PHOENIX trial of ibrutinib with R-CHOP. Methods REMoDL-A is a stratified open-label UK multicentre randomised phase II study. Eligible pts had newly diagnosed DLBCL requiring full course R-CHOP. Initially, all pts received 1 cycle of R-CHOP chemotherapy prior to 2:1 randomisation between R-CHOP+A or R-CHOP for a further 5 cycles. The randomisation was stratified by molecular subtyping by gene expression profiling (GEP), International Prognostic Index (IPI) and age. In March 2023, Pola-R-CHP was commissioned in the UK for pts with DLBCL and an IPI score of 2-5. REMoDL-A was therefore amended such that pts with IPI 0-1 continued to be randomised but those with IPI 2-5 were, all assigned to R-CHOP+A. Bayesian dynamic borrowing of historical information via a Meta-Analytic Prior (MAP) approach will be used to incorporate R-CHOP treated patients' data from the REMoDL-B trial (ISRCTN51837425) into the efficacy analysis. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include PFS by COO and genomic subtypes, duration of response, overall survival, event free survival, toxicity and quality of life. The trial was powered to detect a hazard ratio of 0.67 with 90% power with a maximum 1-sided significance level of 20% and required ~375 patients. REMoDL-A is a UK Blood Cancer Research Network multicentre trial coordinated by Southampton Clinical Trials Unit and endorsed by CRUK (C30423/A29680). Trial registration: NCT04546620. Results From Nov 2021 to May 2025, 261 eligible pts from 46 sites were enrolled into REMoDL-A. 54 pts were randomised to R-CHOP and 119 to R-CHOP+A. A further, 82 pts with IPI score 2-5 were directly allocated to R-CHOP+A following the amendment (6 pts GEP failed and were allocated to R-CHOP). Median age was 64 years (range 17-83); 76% stage III/IV; 63% elevated LDH; 30% B symptoms; 44% bulk; 20% high IPI; 55% high-intermediate IPI. By GEP, 30% had Activated B-cell molecular profile, 45% Germinal Centre B-cell, 6% Molecular High Grade, 16% unclassified and 3% GEP fail. At the data cutoff on 19May2025 221/261 pts had finished treatment. 93% (54/58) of pts on R-CHOP and 93% (152/163) on R-CHOP+A had completed all 6 cycles of R-CHOP treatment. 85% of pts. allocated to R-CHOP+A received all 5 cycles of A. 18% of pts had a dose reduction in A. Relative dose intensity (RDI) of all R-CHOP components were similar by arm and age with similar RDI values observed to those in REMoDL-B. Median RDI was ≥ 97% for all R-CHOP components for pts aged≥ 65 years on RCHOP+A and was not significantly different by arm (p-values>0.05). A similar proportion of pts experienced an adverse event (AE) of any grade; R-CHOP 95% vs. 96% on R-CHOP+A (grade≥3 48% vs 52%). The same % of pts experienced at least one serious AE (SAE) on R-CHOP vs R-CHOP+A; 41%. The most common AEs of any grade were fatigue (51%) constipation (45%) and nausea (39%), both similar by arm. There was slightly more neutropenia in pts treated with R-CHOP+A than R-CHOP (all grade 16% vs 12%: Grade≥3 10% vs 7%), but less febrile neutropenia (4% vs 7%) and all cause infection was similar (14% vs 15%). The same pattern was observed by age and grade≥3 (differences not significantly different). There was more grade≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity observed in pts aged≥65 treated with R-CHOP+A than R-CHOP (13% vs 0%, p-value 0.07) but no difference in younger pts (7%). There were 5 fatal AEs across all arms, only 1 was considered possibly related to R-CHOP+A (bronchial pneumonia). Conclusions The addition of A to R-CHOP does not impact upon dose delivery of R-CHOP across all age groups. Some additional GI toxicity was observed in older pts but overall, the AE profile was similar by arm and age. The final PFS trial results will be available in 2027. R-CHOP+A is also being assessed in the randomised ESCALADE (NCT04529772) trial for younger patients with non-GC DLBCL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207