FoG-STAR: Freezing of Gait Severity, Tasks, Activities, and Ratings
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
README – FoG-STAR: Freezing of Gait Severity, Tasks, Activities, and Ratings 📌 Overview This dataset contains wearable inertial sensor recordings and clinical/demographic information collected from 22 people with Parkinson’s disease.It is designed to support research on Freezing of Gait (FoG) detection, severity estimation, activity recognition, and digital biomarkers. The dataset is organized in two CSV files: sensor_data.csv → synchronized inertial sensor signals with FoG labels and task annotations clinical_data.csv → subject-level demographic and clinical assessments 📂 Files sensor_data.csv → Sensor-based recordings (31 columns, sampled at 60 Hz) clinical_data.csv → Demographic and clinical metadata (10 variables × 22 subjects) README.md → This documentation README.txt → Readme file with summarized information LICENSE → Dataset license (CC-BY 4.0) FoG-Star_Analytics.ipynb → Example Python utilities for generating statistics and figures fogstar_environment.yaml→ Conda environment specification to execute the scripts 📑 1. Sensor Data (sensor_data.csv) Recording setup Sensors: Accelerometer (g) + Gyroscope (°/s) Positions: Left ankle, Right ankle, Back, Wrist Sampling frequency: 60 Hz Recording context: Motor tasks designed to elicit or challenge gait Column definitions Column(s) Name Description 1 timestamp Float, timestamp in ms (60 Hz) 2–25 Sensor signals Format: [position]_[sensor]_[axis]. Positions = ankleL, ankleR, back, wrist; Sensor = acc (g), gyro (°/s); Axis = x,y,z 26 activity Motor activity code: 1=Walking, 2=Sit, 3=Stand, 4=Sit-to-Stand, 5=Stand-to-Sit, 6=Turn Right, 7=Turn Left 27 fog Binary FoG label: 0=No FoG, 1=FoG 28 fog_severity Severity during FoG: 1=Shuffling, 2=Trembling, 3=Akinesia 29 subjectID Subject identifier (1–22), link to clinical_data.csv 30 sessionID Recording session ID (usually 1, but >1 if multiple recordings were needed) 31 taskID Task code: 1=Timed Up-and-Go, 2=Stand 1min, 3=Walk back/forth, 4=Walk+Doorway, 5=Walk+Water, 6=Walk+Count, 7=360° turn 📑 2. Clinical Data (clinical_data.csv) Population 22 subjects with Parkinson’s disease Each row corresponds to one subject (linked via subjectID) Column definitions Column Variable Description 1 subjectID Subject ID (1–22), matches sensor_data.csv 2 age Age in years 3 gender Gender (M/F) 4 disease_duration Years since PD diagnosis 5 h_y Hoehn & Yahr stage (0–5, higher = more advanced PD) 6 updrs_iii MDS-UPDRS Part III score (0–132, higher = worse motor impairment) 7 fog_q New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (0–28, higher = more severe FoG) 8 moca Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0–30, lower = worse cognition) 9 fes Falls Efficacy Scale (10–100, higher = more fear of falling) 10 pdq_8 Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire–8 (0–32, higher = poorer QoL) 👩⚕️ Study Protocol Participants: 22 people with PD Tasks performed: 7 mobility tasks (see taskID) designed to elicit FoG Annotations: FoG presence and severity labeled by experts via video analysis Clinical scales: Hoehn & Yahr, MDS-UPDRS III, FoG-Q, MoCA, FES-I, PDQ-8 📊 Example Usage import pandas as pd # Load data df_sensors = pd.read_csv("fog_star.csv") df_clinical = pd.read_csv("clinical_data.csv") # Merge datasets df = df_sensors.merge(df_clinical, on="subjectID") # Example: Average FoG severity per subject print(df.groupby("subjectID")["fog_severity"].mean()) # Example: Correlation between UPDRS-III score and FoG proportion fog_ratio = df.groupby("subjectID")["fog"].mean().reset_index() merged = fog_ratio.merge(df_clinical, on="subjectID") print(merged[["subjectID","fog","updrs_iii"]]) 📈 Provided Scripts Data exploration: distributions of FoG vs non-FoG, FoG severity, time per task/activity/subject FoG event analysis: duration distributions, severity-based comparisons Signal visualization: example raw traces with shaded FoG episodes Clinical correlation: merge sensor_data with clinical_data 🔖 Citation If you use this dataset, please cite: Borzi, L. et al. FoG-STAR: Freezing of Gait Severity, Tasks, Activities, and Ratings [Data set]. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17838806 Borzì, L. et al. A multi-level annotated sensor dataset of gait freezing manifestations and severity in Parkinson’s disease. Scientific Data 13, 305 (2026). doi: 10.1038/s41597-026-06645-1 Borzi, L. et al. Freezing of gait detection: The effect of sensor type, position, activities, datasets, and machine learning model. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease, 15(1), 163-181. doi: 10.1177/1877718X241302766 Demrozi, F. et al. A low-cost wireless body area network for human activity recognition in healthy life and medical applications. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 11, no. 4 (2023): 839-850. doi: 10.1109/TETC.2023.3274189 ⚖️ License This dataset is licensed under CC-BY 4.0. You are free to share and adapt the data with proper attribution.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,021 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».