Manhaj Abi Bakr Ibn al-'Arabi fi ikhtiyaratihi al-fiqhiyah min khilal kitabihi "'Aridat al-ahwadhi" : kitab al-taharah namudhajan = Abu Bakr ibn al-`Arabi's methodology for juristic opinions in his book 'Aridat al-ahwadhi, using "The book of purification" as a data sample / Qusay ibn Muhammad Karyim
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis explains Abu Bakr ibn al-‘Arabi’s juristic choices in “The Book of Purification” from his work ‘Aridat al-Ahwadhi, and his methodology for doing so. This researcher has used an inductive methodology, surveying the works of Ibn al-‘Arabi as well as other books, particularly books of fiqh and usul al-fiqh, and then analyzing Ibn al-‘Arabi’s choices and comparing them with the legal opinions of other jurists. The study also undertakes a concise biography of Ibn al-‘Arabi and an overview of his book ‘Aridat al-Ahwadhi and the general methodology he employed in it. After that it focuses on extracting his fiqh opinions from “The Book of Purification”, studying them and comparing them with the legal opinions of other jurists from his own school of thought, the Maliki madhhab, as well as those of jurists from other madhhabs. It then explains his methodology for making those choices and his methods of expressing them. The results of the study are that Ibn al-‘Arabi has made more than ١٣٠ choices [as to the weightiest of variant opinions] on fiqh issues in “The Book of Purification” and that he relies on the various sources of the Shari‘ah in doing so, such as the Qur’an and Sunnah, consensus (ijma‘) the practice of the Sahabah, and other classes of evidence. He uses a variety of ways to express his preferences, sometimes explicitly stating them and sometimes not. He frequently gives preference to the opinions of his school of thought, the Maliki madhhab, but he also frequently opposes them (in approximately one quarter of the issues). He also takes an independent stance on a number of issues. All of that is based upon his ijtihad and his interpretation of the relevant evidence, as is treated in detail in the thesis. This indicates that he was, indeed, a mujtahid, a jurist qualified to reason independently in fiqh issues. Mujtahids of this caliber would operate within the evidentiary methodology (usul) of a particular well established madhhab but were distinguished by their independent stances on detailed fiqh issues. This was only because of their vast knowledge and sophisticated understanding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».