MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7110625803

The Soft Power of the Russian Language (Book Review)

2020· other· W7110625803 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2020
Typeother
Langue
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLanguage policyIdeologyPoliticsRussian languagePower (physics)Lingua francaSoft powerConverse
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This collaborative work examines the socio-linguistic situations of the Russian language and its status outside the Russian Federation, or, as the authors put it, the Near and Far Abroad.[1] The pluricentric trends that involve political, ideological and socio-economic power, and the intensified centrifugal tendencies in the development of Russian on the territory of ex-Soviet states are also analyzed. The book consists of four chapters. Each chapter is composed of several articles (twenty-one) that complement one another. Part I In “Russian as a Communicative Tool: lingua franca, intermediator or something else?”, the authors examine a number of issues. These range from concerns about increasing language contacts due to wide-scale migrations that have resulted in bilingual societies; language policies implemented according to the needs of a multilingual society; and the promotion of linguistic rights by interest groups and NGOs. The authors explain how the White Wave of Russian émigrés adjusted to their new lives, or lived like a strangers till the end of their lives, and the significant impact they left in many countries since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. This Chapter is completed by an historical analysis of the internalization of the Russian language during the Soviet Union and discusses how language policies differed from one territory to another; the process of alphabet change and the problem of alphabet choice which is directly connected to the political and cultural orientation of the state; how linguistic norms are determined by the authorities as top-down policies and whether they are democratic or antidemocratic; the radical changes witnessed in language practice; the massive influx of loanwords which threatens the vitality of Russian language; the expansion of brutal and colloquial lexicons; whether systematic normalization measures are being taken by the former Soviet states and whether the former states have created an inherent natural norm; and, finally, whether the situation is different in the countries where Russian is heavily influenced by the surrounding society and languages. Part 2 “The Russian-language legacy” examines the official language policies in the post-Soviet countries and the use and the status of the Russian language. These countries include the Caucasus states: Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan; the Baltic states: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania; the Slavic states: Belarus, Ukraine; and the Central Asian states: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan. After giving a short historical perspective, the authors discuss the current language policies in each country. Part 3, “The Russian speaking diaspora” is concerned with the Russian-speaking diaspora living in European countries such as France, Germany, and Finland; Canada, South America and the USA. Each author deals with the history of Russian immigration, the attitudes toward Russian, the acquisition and maintenance of Russian and its use in education, the role of the internet and the role of the communication networks. This chapter also discusses the Russian dialects spoken by the Old Believers who were quite successful in preserving their language outside of Russia. Part 4, “New trends in the functioning of the Russian language” talks about how Russianness was an effective tool to strengthen the cultural and linguistic bond between former Soviet citizens and hold the Russian-speaking diasporas around the world together. It focuses on the importance of family interactions for language maintenance and discusses how parents transmit their language to their children by providing a comparative analysis of the situation in Cyprus and Sweden. This chapter ends with an article that examines current Russian language teaching, problems and methods in Japanese high schools. The book is a well-written and well-referenced collaborative work that presents a broad analysis of the historical developments of the socio-linguistic situations of the Russian language and its status outside the Russian Federation. The primary audience for this reference book are researchers who are interested in the field of Russian language history, and language teaching. This book complements previous studies written on language politics and policies towards Russian and the issues of diaspora communities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,057

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)Travaux en français237 207