Towards benefit oriented rehabilitation to make degraded lakes more resilient to extreme climatic events
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ENG- The delineation of the current geological epoch as the “Anthropocene,” derived from the prefix “anthro-” meaning “human,” aptly summarizes the sheer magnitude in which humans have affected the biosphere. For many ecosystems, these pressures have caused long-term degradations to their health and functions. Freshwater systems such as lakes are particularly susceptible as these lentic water bodies act as sentinels of change in the region by accumulating information from the whole catchment. With pressures from anthropogenic actions and climatic scenarios projected to continue, if not intensify, in the coming decades, there is concern regarding the impairment of lake ecosystems. Of the climatic projections, one of the more recent concerns is the intensifying frequency and severity of extreme climatic events (“ECEs”), or a climatic event such as a heatwave or precipitation that is in the tail ends (e.g. 99th percentile) of the distribution curve for that region or time of year. The potential for these events to instigate disproportionate disruptions within freshwater systems worldwide can be significant. Paired with other, non-climatic pressures derived from human actions, such as wide-spread land use change and pandemic outbreaks, there can be multiple pressures affecting the biosphere sequentially or in tandem. Depending upon the nature of the pressure, these can be categorized as “pulse” stressors which are generally short-lived events, such as heatwaves or extreme precipitation, and “press” stressors which have a long-lasting or chronic duration, such as ecosystem alterations (e.g. urbanization, dam construction, etc.) or climate change. Degradation of systems presents challenges not only for the biosphere itself but for human communities as our livelihoods are tied to and built upon the functions and values that the biosphere provides. If the trend of increasing pressures is permitted to continue without intervention, human health, well-being and economies could be impacted just as much as the ecosystem inhabitants. With lakes being the abundantly utilized and vulnerable systems that they are, approaching these multifaceted problems will require looking beyond just the science sector to address present and future challenges. In this thesis, the research traces the cause-effect relationship from 1) the occurrence of extreme event(s) to 2) their implications on ecosystem functions to 3) the effect on ecosystem service provisioning and 4) the implications that intersectoral collaborations could have on ecosystem remediation. This is conducted through an interdisciplinary approach with each chapter using different methodologies to tackle various aspects of this cause-effect chain. Maintaining status quo approaches to utilizing, studying and managing lakes will not be sufficient for improving or preserving ecosystem health and functions in the future. Navigating the razor’s edge of maintained lake functions and services in an extreme world requires informed, proactive, inclusive and holistic methods. By recognizing the urgency of the situation and adapting the approaches used for this new reality, the biosphere and dependent anthropogenic communities may be able to weather the extremes
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».