Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Canola (Brassica napus L., abbreviated as B. napus in the following text) is positioned as an economically significant oilseed species in the Canadian agriculture industry. Plant breeders are continuously committing to improving seeds’ protein quality through various breeding programs to increase the economic value of B. napus by capitalizing on the meal co-product of the oil crushing industry for broader utilization. To assess multiple quality traits of a vast number of seed samples within a limited time frame is still a real challenge in the practical B. napus breeding program. Hence, near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) has been proposed to replace traditional wet chemistry analysis methods for predicting seed quality traits in B. napus breeding programs accurately and rapidly. \nAim: The current study focused on developing and validating NIRS calibration models for predicting protein and amino acid contents in B. napus seeds and meals; investigating the effects of different spectrometers and sample status on NIRS calibration predictive performance; exploring the applications of the NIRS calibration model on B. napus seeds in practical breeding studies, including discovering the correlation of essential quality traits, as well as investigating the effects of genotype and environment on seed quality.\nMethods: In total, 480 B. napus seed samples were selected from the 2015 and 2020 cropping year populations; among those, 420 samples were randomly picked and assigned for constructing calibration models, and the rest were used for the external validation study. A partial least square regression technique was performed using the Unscrambler X10.3 software for NIRS model calibration and verification on meal and whole seed basis, with the spectra data obtained from two spectrometers (PerkinElmer DA7250 and PerkinElmer FT9700) and reference crude protein and amino acid contents values determined through traditional wet chemistry methods. Predicted results were used for correlation analysis and variance analysis with SAS 9.4.\nResults: The calibration models of crude protein and most amino acids except for Tryptophan, Histidine, and Sulphur amino acids showed an acceptable performance with high coefficients of determinations and a low standard error of calibration. The NIR models for Tryptophan, Histidine, and Sulphur amino acids were less accurate, and thus require future research. Besides, PerkinElmer DA 7250 was found to have a similar predictive performance as the PerkinElmer FT 9700, with no significant differences. Specific sample treatments including grinding and Soxhlet defatting led to more uniform sample morphology, which improved the NIRS model forecasting ability on a meal basis. The use of the NIRS modeling within a B. napus breeding study led to a relatively high correlation between essential amino acid and fatty acid profiles through the prediction with the NIRS calibration model. Additionally, different levels of influences of genotype and location and their interactions on B. napus seed quality were discovered.\nConclusion: This study illustrated that NIR spectroscopy could be routinely used for measuring the crude protein content of B. napus with great accuracy; the study also indicated that NIRS could rapidly predict amino acid contents of B. napus with acceptable precision on either a meal or seed basis. There is the potential to integrate NIRS technology to feed research and industry level for further B. napus meal capitalization. Significant potential exists to integrate the NIRS technology into established breeding programs, further improving B. napus quality.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,145 | 0,067 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».