Notice bibliographique
Résumé
MANUSCRIPT TYPES AND SCOPE The Journal publishes original research, review articles, short reports, selected summaries, success stories/features, student sections, book reviews, film reviews, correspondence, and other content related to inclusion, disability, neurorehabilitation, and empowerment. All submissions must align with the journal’s aim of advancing inclusion and disability research. SUBMISSION PROCESS Manuscripts must be submitted electronically via the journal’s online submission system. Authors should register/login to the journal website, follow the “Submit a Manuscript” link. LANGUAGE, STYLE, AND EDITING Manuscripts must be in clear, academic English. (Language-editing services are available through the journal site.) Authors should use British spelling consistently. Abbreviations/acronyms: define them on first use. Use consistent terminology. FORMATTING There should be a title page, abstract, keywords, main text, acknowledgments, references, etc. (Standard sections appropriate to the article type.) Abstract: Typically concise; include key objectives, methods, results, conclusions. Lippincott Journals A few (often 3-6) words capturing the article’s scope. FIGURES & TABLES Insert figures and tables appropriately in the manuscript; ensure they are legible, well-labelled, and cited in text. Legends and captions should be detailed enough to stand alone. REFERENCES Use the Vancouver style for references Include all authors in the list; full journal names or standard abbreviations PEER REVIEW & ETHICAL STANDARDS Submissions are peer reviewed. Authors are expected to disclose any conflicts of interest. Research involving human participants must include statements about ethics approval and informed consent. AUTHOR RESPONSIBILITIES & AUTHORSHIP All listed authors must have contributed significantly to the work. Corresponding author is responsible for communication with the journal, ensuring all co-authors approve the final version. PUBLICATION FREQUENCY The journal is biannual: two issues per year. SUGGESTIONS IF YOU’RE PREPARING A MANUSCRIPT SUGGESTED FORMATTING Feel free to check recent issues of The Journal of Inclusion and Disability to see how articles are formatted, which gives hints about their preferences. Checklist for Authors TITLE PAGE The title page should include: Type of manuscript (e.g., Original Article, Review, Short Report, Selected Summary etc.) Full title of the manuscript Author details: full name, institutional affiliation (department, institution, city, country), and email address for each author Corresponding author details: full name, affiliation, postal address, email address, and phone number (if required) Declarations, including: Funding statement Conflict of interest declaration Ethical approval statement (if applicable) Consent for publication (if applicable) Data availability statement Author contributions Acknowledgments (if any) ABSTRACT (STRUCTURED) The abstract should be structured with the following headings: Background; Aims and Objectives; Materials and Methods; Results; Conclusion. Ensure it is concise, within 200 word limit, and contains no citations. INTRODUCTION Provide background information, rationale for the study, relevant literature, and clearly state the study objectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS Describe the study design, setting, study duration, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria, data collection methods, instruments used, and statistical analysis. Include ethical approval and informed consent statements when applicable. RESULTS Present findings clearly and logically without interpretation. Avoid duplication between text, tables, and figures. Use appropriate units, statistical indicators, and significance values. DISCUSSION Interpret key findings and compare them with existing literature. Discuss strengths, limitations, and implications. Avoid repeating detailed numerical results. CONCLUSION Provide a concise summary of the main findings aligned with the study objectives. Avoid introducing new data. REFERENCES All references must be cited in the text. Citations should appear as superscript numbers. References must be listed in chronological order of appearance. Follow Vancouver style, including authors (upto 6 authors then et al.), article title, journal abbreviation, year, volume(issue), and page numbers. TABLES All tables must be cited in the text in numerical order. Each table must have a clear title above it and a legend or footnotes below explaining abbreviations or statistical symbols. Tables should be clear, not duplicating data already in the text. FIGURES All figures must be cited in the text in numerical order. Each figure must have a descriptive legend below it. Ensure high resolution and appropriate labeling. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Define abbreviations at their first appearance in the manuscript. Ensure grammar, spelling, and formatting consistency (British English). Obtain required permissions for reproduced material. Label and reference supplementary materials appropriately. Editors, The Journal of Inclusion and Disability – Research, Neurorehabilitation and Empowerment
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,064 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,819 | 0,830 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».