MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7111226697 · doi:10.26077/e5a3-0n83

AMSAT-OSCAR-7, A Still Operational, Small-Satellite History Lesson

2025· other· W7111226697 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · 2025
Typeother
Langue
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSpacecraft Design and Technology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpacecraftSpace AgeSatelliteLaunchedPlanetSpace (punctuation)Outer space

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It has often been reported that the oldest satellites still working in space are, collectively, the JPL Space Probes Voyager 1 and Voyager 2. The Voyagers were both launched in 1977 to take advantage of the planetary alignment called, back then, the "Grand Tour". This was the alignment of the outer planets, which allowed, using gravitational assist, both Voyagers to visit multiple planets each. Both missions were nothing short of spectacular and they still expand our imaginations. Their images changed the human vision of our solar system. But, are they really the oldest, still functional spacecraft in outer space? What if we include spacecraft that remained behind in Earth Orbit? Is it even believable to state that the oldest still working satellite in space wasn't even designed or operated by NASA, USAF, ESA or any other space agency? What if it was stated that this satellite was designed by radio amateurs and the final assembly occurred in a basement laboratory not far from Goddard Space Flight Center? What if it was noted that 2024 is the 50th anniversary of this satellite, launched on 15 November 1974? and, as you will see (and hear) in this paper, the spacecraft, AMSAT-OSCAR-7 (AO-7) is still providing service to hundreds of radio operators around the world, as it has for a very, very long time. And, would you believe that the oldest satellite working around our planet is a SmallSat weighing 29 Kg? The above, as nearly as we can determine, is all true and this is the amazing story of what made this possible and why this satellite os sometimes called the "Sleeping Beauty Satellite." We describe here the story of how the mission was conceived, how radio amateurs from four countries worked together to develop a very complex spacecraft with quite a creative payload. We want to explain the many successes of this communications satellite during its primary mission, and we want to surprise you with the extended mission, which continues to this day. The technology employed by AO-7 was advanced and, in certain aspects, was ahead of the primary spacecraft it flew with (NOAA-4/ITOS-G). We'll tell that story, as well as summarizing other forthcoming special papers relating to the satellite's orbit, power and communications systems and radiation exposure. Time permitting, during the oral presentation of this paper, we will demonstrate the still-functional, robust, telemetry systems and communications transponders aboard AO-7. This is possible, as all these systems can be witnessed using only an audio feed. Much of the telemetry is provided by a very reliable Canadian-provided, 435 MHz beacon transmitter coupled to a novel circularly polarized antenna. We would also like to invite any member of the audience to participate in using AO-7 to do their own experiments as AO-7 moves into the future. AO-7 has already lived longer than many of its designers and operators. It is just possible that it will outlast all of us. - Still in its 1450 km SSO, waiting for the next generation of SmallSat engineers to learn from what it can teach them.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,649
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,183
Écart entre enseignants0,166 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigital Commons - USU (Utah State University)Même sujetSpacecraft Design and TechnologyTravaux en français237 207