Sustainable Seafood Approaches for New Hampshire
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In 2023, the U.S. seafood trade deficit was $20.3 billion, importing both capture fishery and aquaculture products mostly from Canada, Chile, India, Indonesia and Vietnam. With U.S. capture fishery production of $5.6 billion, responsible aquaculture has the potential to close this difference. The University of New Hampshire (UNH) is addressing this issue through the Center of Sustainable Seafood Systems (CSSS) by developing innovative production technologies and practices through interdisciplinary research. This presentation will provide a scientific and engineering overview of these practices at four permitted aquaculture sites along the NH coast. The most extensive effort is being conducted at a nearshore site off New Castle with the operation of a community-scale, integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA) system. The concept of IMTA is to employ the culture of high valued fed species, alongside non-fed, extractive species at biomass levels to offset the input of nutrients while enhancing the growth. The IMTA approach is to produce and harvest steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), together with blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) to remove nutrients. With such field operations, detailed datasets are being collected to examine the biological, chemical and physical processes associated with the IMTA method. The datasets include steelhead trout feed input trout, growth, harvest and sales from our present operational cycle. A moored, oceanographic buoy has also been deployed in this last year to acquire water quality information to include temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, chlorophyl, pH, nitrate, fluorescent dissolved organic matter, and current velocities. Part of the assessment is to analyze the total ammonia nitrogen entering the system by feeding the fish. With proximate analysis results, the amount of particulate organic nitrogen removed by mussels, and dissolved nitrogen removed by kelp, can be calculated. This information is being utilized to size the IMTA farm to match the biomass of extractive species with that of the fed species. Waves and current velocity profiles are also being measured at the site and are being used with loadcell datasets to validate numerical models of the IMTA structure for more accurate future design efforts. Research is also being done at the other three permitted aquaculture sites. One of these aquaculture permits was obtained with the Seacoast Science Center in Rye to provide community education and outreach. At another one of the sites, adjacent to Appledore Island, whale safe gear for kelp farming is being field tested. The fourth site is 130 acres, 2.5 miles offshore of Jenness Beach, in a depth of 35 m. At this fully exposed location, novel aquaculture systems for mussels, scallops and seaweed are being designed to withstand the rigors of extreme storms and to minimize risk to whales that frequent the area. Presenter Bio David W. Fredriksson joined the School of Marine Science and Ocean Engineering and the faculty of Mechanical Engineering at the University of New Hampshire in August 2022. He is also the Director of the Center for Sustainable Seafood Systems. Dr. Fredriksson brings over two decades of experience developing ocean engineering methodologies for the farming of finfish, shellfish and macroalgae, with the goal of supporting seafood security for both the United States and abroad. His underlying passion is to grow new sustainable production methods and educational programs that will enhance both local maritime communities and the ocean environment. Professor Fredriksson has been the Principal Investigator for numerous research efforts, with projects most recently funded by the Department of Energy, World Wildlife Fund, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,088 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».