Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For the international media, the SARS virus was the next big story after the Iraq War. As SARS spread quickly around the world via Hong Kong, the medical, social, economic and political aspects of the disease were the subjects of extensive media coverage. At the outset, the lack of information about the virus led to some highly sensational reporting. This situation was compounded by the fact that SARS originated in China, where the government's penchant for secrecy made it hard to get at the facts. Early reports were often incomplete and raised many worrisome questions. However, despite criticisms that the media was fear mongering, intense and highly critical international reporting helped pressure the Chinese Government to be more transparent about the outbreak. For the Hong Kong media, SARS was one of the biggest news stories ever. The local media played a special role in the reporting of the outbreak worldwide, as it was only when SARS hit Hong Kong in late February 2003 that it received international attention. Unlike mainland China, Hong Kong enjoys freedom of expression and freedom of the press, factors that enabled both the local and the international media to report on the domestic situation as Hong Kong emerged as the epicentre of the worldwide SARS outbreak and provide the global community with information about the new disease. The SARS outbreak showed that a free media is vital in a crisis situation and in keeping the authorities honest. While there have been criticisms that the media "hyped" the outbreak and exaggerated its effect, it should remembered that the initial sensational reporting had much to do with the novelty of the disease and the lack of information from mainland authorities. This chapter starts by examining how the international media reported the outbreak in Hong Kong, which in turn shaped public perceptions worldwide. It goes on to discuss the HKSAR Government's shortcomings in handling communication with the media and takes a look at the various roles played by the local media during the crisis. It notes, for example, how the Hong Kong media defended press freedom when it saw this being threatened by the government's attempt to pass new national security legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law. It continues by comparing how SARS was reported in Hong Kong and Toronto in order to draw insights about the differences between the two societies. Finally, the media's situation in mainland China is discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,031 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».