The Making of the Digital Avant-Garde: The Anglo-American Digital Avant-Garde Discourse in Architecture
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the 1990s, an Anglo-American digital avant-garde discourse emerged in architecture. This discourse narrowly defined digital avant-gardism through a set of theoretical explorations and formal experimentations and popularized a narrative of a young generation of architects—mainly white male architects affiliated with Anglo-American institutions—leading the discipline into a new digital age. This discourse’s narratives have been widely circulated, documented, and reproduced and often presented, unqualified, as the story of the digital revolution or the digital turn in architecture. This dissertation defines the boundaries of this discourse, rooting it in an Anglo-American institutional context, and studies the cultural, economic, and disciplinary conditions and discursive constraints that led to its emergence and prominence. Instead of an avant-garde that challenges the status quo, the Anglo-American digital avant-garde was a product of the status quo of Anglo-American architectural culture. As this dissertation argues, unlike the historical avant-garde that has been defined through its movement against the institution, the Anglo-American digital avant-garde was an institutional construct. It was a concept that was devised by architectural publications, universities, and cultural institutions as a promotional and branding tool that allowed these institutions—through association with a vague notion of the “new” and “cutting edge”—to thrive in an increasingly competitive and privatized higher education market and architectural cultural industry. In its redefining of the Anglo-American digital avant-garde as an institutionally constructed concept instead of an architectural movement or revolution, this dissertation traces the emergence and development of the Anglo-American digital avant-garde discourse, not in specific groups of architects or works of architecture, but in a series of institutional and discursive moments: the emergence of the discourse from within a US neo-avant-garde discourse in which high theory debates were prerequisite for avant-gardism, the publication of the Architectural Design special issue “Folding in Architecture” in 1993 and its subsequent branding as the manifesto for the digital avant-garde, Columbia University’s Paperless Studio experiment launched in 1994 and its branding as the birthplace of a new digital architectural style, and a number of publications and exhibitions that popularized and disseminated the discourse’s narratives such as the Canadian Centre for Architecture’s Archaeology of the Digital project launched in 2013. Through its analysis of the discourse, rendering its boundaries visible, situating it with its institutional and regional context, and identifying its network of actors, this dissertation sheds light on the mechanisms of discourse-building and the cultural and disciplinary conditions that privileged the Anglo-American-affiliated architects and the narratives of the Anglo-American digital avant-garde discourse and marginalized more diverse yet less publicity-driven digital discourses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».