Qualitative Themes and Associations Between Parental Feeding Behaviors and Youth Body Image Among Black and Latino Caregivers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Emphasis on parenting for healthy eating habits has increased with increased attention to rising rates of childhood obesity globally. Prior research has primarily focused on the impact of food parenting behaviors on child and adolescent eating behaviors, it has yet to be explored the impact food parenting may have on psychological outcomes such as body image, which also impact eating behaviors in youth. Further, adolescents, racial and ethnic minorities, and individuals in larger bodies are at higher risk of experiencing body dissatisfaction, engaging in disordered eating and weight control behaviors, and less likely to be diagnosed or receive timely care. This work focuses on the experiences of diverse understudied populations. Objectives: Utilizing a multigenerational life-course framework, this thesis investigates the relationship between body image and food parenting. The aims of the thesis were: (i) Understanding how parenting strategies for diet, physical activity, and coping behaviors are influenced by personal and social experiences of body image and body ideal internalization among Black women caregivers, (ii) Explore associations between parent feeding styles and adolescent body esteem in Costa Rican families, (iii) Identify associations between parent feeding behaviors and youth body dissatisfaction and disordered eating outcomes, and identify if acculturative stress modifies these relationships. Methods: The first chapter qualitatively explores the role that body image plays in parenting decisions using a thematic framework analysis in a cohort of Black women caregivers enrolled in a weight management randomized control trial. The second chapter cross-sectionally investigates associations between parent feeding style using the Parent Feeding Questionnaire (PFQ) and body esteem outcomes using the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults (BESAA) in dyads of Costa Rican parents and their adolescents 13-19 years using. The third chapter investigates cross-sectional associations between parent feeding behaviors measured using the Parenting for Eating and Activity Scale (PEAS-Diet) and youth desire for thinness measured using scores from the Body Contour Test and youth history of dieting in a US-based cohort of Hispanic/Latino parents and children 8-16 years. Results: (i) Black women caregivers expressed multiple modalities for sources of body image, emphasizing the role of family members. Their personal experiences with body image influenced their motivations and strategies for parenting their children for healthy body esteem and healthy habits. (ii) No associations were found between appearance and weight-specific body esteem scores and any parent feeding behavior, however an inverse association was found between attribution body esteem and instrumental feeding behavior. (iii) No significant associations were found between parent feeding behavior and youth desire for thinness, however a strong positive association was found between youth history of dieting and monitoring food parenting behavior. Youth acculturative stress was positively associated with youth history of dieting, however there was not evidence for effect measure modification. Conclusions: Caregivers described multiple ways their personal and social experiences with body image inform their parenting strategies for youth body esteem and health behaviors. Food parenting behaviors did not show strong empirical evidence for an association between most body esteem outcomes, however there is evidence that suggests there may be an association between perception of external body validation and parent feeding behavior. The evidence also suggests that parent feeding behavior may be mimicked in youth eating behaviors, including dieting behaviors. Further investigation is recommended to understand unintended consequences of recommended food parenting behaviors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».