Graduate Student Practice Presentations for MTS/IEEE OCEANS Halifax
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Using Ambient Sensor Data to Characterize and Predict Autonomous Perception Sensor Performance Hannah Arnholt Ph.D. Student AbstractWith the development of low-cost, small Uncrewed Underwater Vehicles (UUVs), the use of cost-efficient sensor systems imposes its own constraints (e.g., sensor accuracy and precision). This presentation will discuss a methodology, the Standardized Heuristic Algorithm for Reinforced Calculations (SHARC), to predict the accuracy and precision of specific perception sensor measurements in practical field implementation by leveraging the redundancy of several common on-board sensors, to help work around the constraints of these smaller, low-cost systems. To test the SHARC algorithm, the study presented focuses on modeling a Mechanically Scanning Imaging Sonar (MSIS) in the BELLHOP simulation program and uses historic Sound Velocity Profiles (SVPs) to identify how the MSIS is affected by various ambient surroundings. Results show that the SVP shape affects the MSIS range of the probability of detection. It is observed that a change in SVP slope correlates to a reduced MSIS performance range as opposed to that of a more constant SVP depth profile, which increases the MSIS performance range. This presentation will also show some follow-on experimental research that was performed this past summer off the Puget Sound in Washington State. Mathematical Model of Subcarangiform Robotic Fish Margaret EnderleM.S. Student AbstractMathematical modeling of robotic fish creates a simulation environment for the manipulation of design and input parameters without the necessity of manipulating the physical model. Combining two mathematical models, one focusing on pectoral fins and the other concentrated on biomimetic thrust, the authors aim to create a mathematical model to simulate the University of New Hampshire’s Ghost Uncrewed Performance Platform Submersible (GUPPS). This model investigates various pectoral fin inputs and their effect on pitch angle, determining maximum operating parameters to maintain biomimicry, and explores system response to high-frequency fin inputs. In addition to the theoretical work, physical research done on GUPPS such as fin development and implementation will also be presented. Presenter Bios Hannah Arnholt is a Ph.D. student at the University of New Hampshire in Ocean Engineering with a focus on bio-inspired underwater perception for Uncrewed Underwater Vehicles (UUVs). Hannah received her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering in 2017 from the University of Miami, working on combustion engine intake efficiency for her senior capstone research. After completing her undergraduate degree, Hannah worked as a Software Requirements Systems Engineer for Raytheon Technologies in Massachusetts, before deciding to return to school for her PhD. Aside from her PhD. research, Hannah has also been a graduate advisor for the Marine and Naval Technological Advancements for Robotic Autonomy (MANTA RAY) group since 2020, which consists of not only aiding with developing different marine robotics platforms but mentoring the different students that help with the project. Hannah's Ph.D. degree is currently being funded by the DoD SMART Scholar program, and she will be working at Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Keyport, WA upon completion of her degree. Maggie Enderle is a master’s student at the University of New Hampshire in Ocean Engineering. After completing her bachelor’s degree at UNH with a senior capstone project developing propulsion of robotic fish, she has continued to build on that research in her graduate program. Her current work focuses on pitch control of robotic fish using pectoral fins, and she will be presenting this research at the OCEANS Halifax conference next week.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».