Compassion Fatigue in Middle Aged Public Health Nurses Working on Disaster Relief Teams
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The nursing shortage is of growing concern to the nation's health care system. The problem and thus the solution are multifaceted. Many solutions exist in alleviating the nursing shortage, one of those solutions is to reduce the incidence of compassion fatigue among nurses. Compassion Fatigue can be a precursor to burnout, a phenomena that may be causing nurses to leave the profession. Compassion fatigue and burnout are a real threat to the nursing profession. During an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in Toronto Canada in 2003, 5 nurses decided to quit their jobs. They decided to quit after "a month of putting up with long hours under unusually strenuous conditions" (CBC News Online Staff, 2003, p. 1). Strenuous conditions included working 12 hour shifts without the allotted breaks, wearing heavy protective gear that caused the nurses to break out in rashes, and fearing they might contract the potentially fatal disease or bring it home to their families. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor of compassion fatigue, and the role it plays in nurses who provide assistance during natural disasters. This study chose to examine only female middle aged nurses who provided care to victims of the 2004 Hurricane season in Florida. The rationale for choosing only female middle aged nurses lies in the fact that they comprise the majority of the current nursing population. Variables such as marital status, number of times deployed to assist victims and number of years in public health, were examined for their effect on levels of risk for compassion fatigue. This study used a subset of data from a pre-existing data set. The original study utilized a retrospective design and had participants complete a survey 3-4 months after they assisted hurricane victims. A total of 500 participants were selected at random by the Department of Health; addresses for those participants were also provided by the Department of Health. Survey packets containing a letter of introduction, letter of consent, stamped return envelope, demographic data sheet and two copies of the Compassion Fatigue Self Test (CFST) were mailed to the 500 participants. Each packet was numerically coded, to keep the participants anonymous, only the original researchers had access to the master list of participants and corresponding codes. Return of the survey served as consent for the study. For the current study only female participants age 40-60 years with complete data were included in the sample. The total number of participants who met the inclusion criteria was 55. Descriptive statistics, factorial ANOVA and simple effects were used to analyze the data. Findings indicate that the majority of the participants were non-Hispanic white, married and had no children living with them at the time they provided care to victims of the hurricanes. This was the first experience assisting victims of a hurricane for the majority of the sample, and they had also not provided assistance in other types of natural disasters. As a result, the average level of risk for compassion fatigue, both during the hurricanes and 3-4 months after, was low. Of the variables that were examined as possible moderating variables on level of risk for compassion fatigue, only years in public health proved to be significant. Results from analyses on years in public heath and compassion fatigue revealed that those with 11-20 years of experience in public health had the greatest rate of change in levels of risk for compassion fatigue experienced during the hurricanes and 3-4 months after. Those who had the most experience in public health did not experience significant levels of risk for compassion fatigue, and they also showed little change from levels experienced during the hurricanes and 3-4 months later. The factors of being middle aged and female seemed to prove beneficial in dealing with compassion stress/fatigue.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».