Health Literacy as a Tool to Improve the Public Understanding of Alzheimer's Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The ultimate goal of health literacy is to improve care by enhancing the patient's quality of life, maximizing clinical outcomes, and reducing inequities in health. Successful restructuring of the healthcare system to make it more effective, efficient, and equitable demands that health literacy be integrated as a key source of theoretical and empirical data regarding patients' needs and wishes. This applies across the life course, but it is especially true for the increasing numbers of older adults who must deal with the medical care system the most, yet often comprehend medical information the least. Nearly nine out of ten people in the United States do not have the level of proficiency in health literacy skills necessary to successfully navigate the healthcare system. According to the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL), populations overrepresented at the lowest levels of health literacy (below basic level) in the United States include people over age 65, those who did not graduate from high school, persons who did not speak English before starting school, people who have poor health status, those who are of racial and ethnic minority groups, and individuals without medical insurance. An increasing number of efforts are ongoing across the United States and internationally to address health literacy. Significant national initiatives include Healthy People 2010, the Joint Commission's report "Improving Health Literacy to Protect Patient Safety," and the U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services Office of the Surgeon General's "Workshop on Improving Health Literacy." Other organizations attempting to address health literacy include the American Medical Association and the Partnership for Clear Health Communication. Many organizations are launching successful health literacy–based interventions such as the Canyon Ranch Institute's Life Enhancement Program, an integrated approach to prevention and wellness. Additionally, there are a growing number of curricula addressing health literacy being developed by a wide range of organizations and individuals. Equally significant efforts are ongoing in a number of countries around the world, particularly Canada, Australia, and Switzerland. The purposes of this article are to familiarize readers with the concept of health literacy; demonstrate how health literacy can serve as a tool to improve the public's understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the seventh leading cause of death; and suggest generally applicable strategies for clinicians.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».