MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7112040375

Gender-targeted Substance Use Interventions for Young Cisgender Women and Transgender Women – A Scoping Review

2024· article· W7112040375 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · 2024
Typearticle
Langue
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolysubstance dependencePsychological interventionYoung adultPublic healthSubstance useTransgenderFocus group
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Polysubstance use among young people has recently become the focus of popular media, public health interventions, and research due to alarming increases in polysubstance use-related morbidity and mortality in younger age groups. Data in Canada and the U.S. indicates that morbidity and mortality due to polysubstance use among youth is increasing. Researchers have shown that adult-focused interventions for polysubstance use cannot simply be ‘mapped onto’ youth, as young people occupy lifeworlds distinct from those of older adults. Adult-focused interventions may be irrelevant and not efficacious for youth. Further, some researchers have argued there need to more gender-targeted interventions to attenuate the impact(s) of polysubstance use arguing that interventions for substance use will be more efficacious if they are gender-targeted. It has been argued that young females/women and young trans women experience and occupy unique lifeworlds that necessitates the development of targeted polysubstance use intervention(s). Our cursory review of the literature on youth/gender-targeted interventions for polysubstance use revealed there have been no systematic (scoping) reviews of the gender-targeted interventions for polysubstance use among young women/females and/or young trans women. The literature we have identified focuses on adult women/females and has highlighted accessibility barriers for adult women seeking substance use services (e.g., a lack of childcare, stigma, concerns about children being taken away, long wait times, etc.) (Elms et al., 2018; Najavits et al., 2018). Several examples of interventions for adult women we have identified include A Woman’s Path to Recovery (female veterans), Helping Women Recover and Beyond Trauma , Breaking the Cycle , female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy, Moment by Moment in women’s recovery. The interventions address pregnant women’s needs, domestic violence needs, and working mothers’ needs (Johnstone et al., 2023). A recently published systematic review of substance use interventions for adult women (Johnstone et al., 2023) indicated several of the interventions they found were efficacious for the treatment of substance use but they noted there were several gaps in the current landscape of female/women-specific substance use interventions including, programs for women with a dual diagnosis (mental health conditions and substance use), integrated treatment for women who experience trauma, programs for homeless women, previously or currently incarcerated women, and institutionalized women. Due to the lack of reviews concerning the landscape of interventions/treatments for young women/females and trans women, this paper will 1) Identify young women/female and trans women-targeted interventions 2) Characterize the nature of the interventions to understand where they have been developed, the rationale for their development and implementation, and the mechanisms through which they impact substance use behaviors, and 3) To identify potential gaps in interventions and areas for improvement. We are undertaking a scoping review of the literature that will map and characterize the young female/women and trans women-targeted interventions for substance use (e.g., opioids, cocaine, alcohol, etc.). Our review follows the protocol for scoping reviews as outlined in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020). The inclusion criteria for this review are, I) Studies including young women/females/trans women (ages 15-25), II) Assessing any treatment or intervention for polysubstance use, and III) Measuring any outcome on substance use. Descriptive statistics will be developed regarding geographic location(s) of the studies, intervention type(s), and substances use outcomes. We will perform a content analysis of the included studies which will summarize the rationale(s) for a female/women/trans woman-targeted approaches, characteristics of the interventions (e.g., inpatient, etc.), and identify what might be ‘missing’ from the interventions or treatments. We are in the process of completing this review and have not yet identified our main argument(s). We anticipate this review will help researchers, policymakers, and professionals working with young women/females and trans women understand which interventions are efficacious and the mechanisms through which they are efficacious. We also anticipate this review will provide an in-depth understanding of the rationale and justifications for gender-targeted/gender diverse intervention(s) and will identify gaps or ‘missing’ considerations in the studies we identify. Despite the fact we are currently in the process of completing this review, our topical focus is aligned with thematic focus of the CSA conference. The results of this review will highlight and emphasize the possibilities of and for gender diverse polysubstance use interventions and highlight the gender-specific needs, desires, and experiences of young people that can be integrated in substance use interventions to attenuate the impacts of the North American polysubstance use health crisis among youth.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,023
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,005
Bibliométrie0,0060,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,309
Tête enseignante GPT0,546
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication ResearchMême sujetLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyTravaux en français237 207