Mujer, Nacion y Progreso en el Discurso del Exilio de Clorinda Matto de Turner y Juana Manuela Gorriti
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The reason for researching the narrative of Juana Manuela Gorriti and Clorinda Matto de Turner is to understand the role they performed in a patriarchal society at the end of the 19th century and how they are able to project through their voice in pro of modernity not only in their respective countries, but also be able to go beyond borders and visualized a 'supranación'. In chapter 2, Juana Manuela Gorriti is presented as a woman and professional who creates differences in relation with other intellectuals of her time by the force and exquisites poetic prose created by memories in combination with fiction, moreover her autobiography is filled with its inventions, an original style, that during her time was object of criticism. On the other hand, Clorinda Matto de Turner has been studied as a representative of the indigenist and naturalist Peruvian literature. As we will see in chapter 3 her effort goes beyond being focused in one marginalized group. Therefore, in order to rebuilt society a change is required, by the participation of intellectuals in the more direct and aggressive approach. This change will also imply a situation of survival that is reflected in their writings such as: essays, discourses, dairies and chronicles. At the end of their lives, both authors remained in Argentina, which was the center of progress in Latin American during the last quarter of 19th century. The Argentinean system was fervently following the ideas of the United States industrialization and capitalism. However, the Latin-American woman continued being a marginalized subject in that period which, according to the patriarchal discourse a woman should be: a wife, a mother and a housewife. Both authors write on 'men affairs ' and doing it implies a dispute with the hegemonic institutions as well as with their own colleagues of the profession. They pursue a communion of ideas among the working intellectuals, for that we establish a connection with José MartÃ's thought who envisions a united America. In order to analyze and to demystify certain categorizations established by the literary canon, chapter 4 will be dedicated to power, sexuality and defiance in relation to women. In summary, there will be a review of the modern imaginary of the Latin-American society dominated by the male idea and the woman discourse or "contradiscurso" will be included in the same level.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».