Technological Capacity Building with Drones in Support of Indigenous Natural Resource Governance, Land Rights, and Title
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Resource governance in Indigenous communities is impacted by the dichotomy between Western power and Indigenous knowledge. In this thesis, I use counter-mapping as a methodology to highlight the value of Indigenous knowledge, drawing on geovisualization methods to build Wet'suwet'en technological capacity to expose and contest settler geographies. I will discuss my experience as an unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) trainer with a Wet'suwet'en field technician team and how my insight can impact future trainers' ability to understand the gap in technological capacity and literacy between provincial government agencies and First Nations. The Canadian province of British Columbia (BC) comprises nearly nine hundred and forty-five thousand square kilometers, 95% of which remains subject to Aboriginal title claims. Historically, the government in BC did not sign formal treaty agreements with the vast majority of the Indigenous nations, whose ancestral land title remains unceded. Over a century has passed since government officials first sought to remove the Indigenous nation of the Wet'suwet'en from their territories onto tiny government-allocated reserves and nearly 50 years since negotiations began for a contemporary treaty. However, there are no agreements that cede authority to the Canadian government over Wet'suwet'en territory. Across this time, the Wet'suwet'en have continued their hereditary governance system. This thesis speaks to the current political geographies of First Nations communities in a time where extractive industries threaten reciprocal land relationships that are the basis for Wet'suwet'en hereditary governance system. Based on research with the Wet'suwet'en, this thesis emphasizes three necessary elements for successful training endeavors to build First Nations technical capacity: (1) centralizing of Wet'suwet'en community values, (2) focusing on increasing sustainable capacity, and (3) prioritizing balanced knowledge transference between First Nations and researchers. Interviews found tensions between the silos of provincial government and the basket of hereditary governance systems. Ethnography training found that reinterpretation should be considered as an additional principle of community-based participatory research partnerships using geospatial methods. Moreover, GIS analysis of the data collected through training activities indicates that logging activity on sampled Wet'suwet'en territories has not historically adhered to established provincial environmental protections regulations, specifically in terms of encroachment into minimum riparian buffer zones along the Zymoetz River.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».