Self-built settlements in Iran as an alternative to social housing : urban poor housing strategies & the state's role in the expropriation of informal spaces : a case-study of Zoorabad-Karaj
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The housing crisis for low-income and vulnerable groups has been a significant challenge, particularly in socio-political contexts lacking social housing policies, such as Iran. In the absence of formal governmental support, the urban poor had no choice but to build their own shelters, mostly on common lands, to meet their housing needs. These self-built settlements are labeled as informal housing by state authorities. However, they have partially addressed the housing crisis for vulnerable populations. While it is the state's responsibility to adopt a custodian role and provide social housing, the Iranian government's hostile approach towards these self-built settlements needs critical examination. This research focuses on ZoorAbad, an informal housing settlement in Iran, to investigate the following questions: 1) How and through what grassroots strategies have the urban poor in ZoorAbad addressed their housing needs over the past 45 years? 2) What has been the government's response and the dialectical relationship between the state and ZoorAbad's self-built housing? Additionally, this study categorizes different groups of the urban poor in ZoorAbad and examines the power dynamics among them. A qualitative, extended-case methodology was employed, encompassing multiple layers of data collection: 1) Reviewing relevant policies, urban planning documents, academic articles, and theses on ZoorAbad and the national context; 2) Analyzing written and oral histories of grassroots neighborhood development, 3) Gathering the viewpoints of ZoorAbad's urban poor regarding their housing challenges and their interactions with the state, particularly concerning the Improvement Plan of ZoorAbad. The methods used include semi-structured interviews, walking, observing, and ethnographic analysis. Based on the extended-case method, two key conclusions emerge: 1) Self-built housing should be recognized as a viable alternative to social housing in socio-political contexts like Iran; 2) The concept of the "squatter government" reveals how modern (neoliberal) states, in specific settings like Iran, exploit urban planning and policymaking tools to confiscate common and private resources. To elaborate on this concept, this research presents another case – Roshankouh village – in Iran with a distinct socio-geographical context. It argues that such governments, rather than acting as custodians, expropriate, speculate on, and extract common resources, dismantle communities and advance oppressive agendas – such as the elimination of minority groups, like Baha'is in Iran.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».