Kivihiilellä tuotetun sähkön rooli Pariisin 2015 ilmastosopimuksen jälkeen
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Coal-fired electricity generation is still a major, increasing source of the global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions accounting for approximately one-fifth of the total GHG emissions. Concurrently, in order to meet the Paris Agreement target to limit global warming “well below 2°C” - which calls for reduction of the global GHG emissions as soon as possible - nations worldwide are pursuing to limit GHG emissions from, inter alia, energy sector. Therefore, the pressure to replace coal with less carbon-intensive fuels is increasing. This thesis observes the role – past, current and future - of coal-fired electricity generation in three developed countries that have had long traditions in coal production and consumption; i.e. the United States of America (USA), Canada and the United Kingdom (UK). The policy framework and market conditions are reviewed to understand the position of coal in national electricity generation mixes. Additionally, future projections are provided based on national energy outlooks and policy announcements. Each observed nation has or is about to implement ambitious targets to reduce GHG emissions from the electricity sector, thus also limiting coal’s share in their generation mixes - if not today, at least in the future. For instance, the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada have both recently implemented carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance standards on coal-fired generating units, ensuring that new coal-fired capacity will not be built without partial carbon capture and storage (CCS) system. The US Environmental Protection Agency has also finalized the rule on fossil fuel-fired generating units in 2015, referred to as the Clean Power Plan (CPP). This plan has been, however, halted by the Supreme Court in early 2016 for at least two years before its final decision on the rule. In addition to direct regulations on the CO2, there are other factors driving nations towards less carbon intensive generation mixes. Most notably, market conditions and competition between generation fuels are encouraging shift from coal to natural gas (NG)-fired electricity generation in particular. That is, NG market prices have been historically low during 2010s, particularly in the USA and Canada, due to the shale gas boom which started in the 2000s. Also tightened limits on hazardous air pollutants such as NOx and SO2 emissions are encouraging early retirements of coal-fired units. Furthermore, decreased competitiveness of coal as a generation fuel has weakened its future prospects. For instance, in order to meet the carbon intensity of a modern NG-fired power plant, a coal-fired unit would need to have at least partial, c. 50%, CCS. Available technologies are still, however, rather expensive and operations have not yet been proven reliable enough on a large scale compared to the widely used NG-fired technologies. While CCS projects may receive additional funding by selling by-products from the CO2 capture process, they are still reliant on government support.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,039 | 0,170 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».