MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7112385444

Postharvest processing of cannabis (Cannabis sativa) and valorization of its stalks

2025· article· en· W7112385444 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPostharvestRaw materialFood processingQuality (philosophy)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The legalization of cannabis in Canada has facilitated the growth of its processing industry. Postharvest drying is a critical determinant of the cannabis product quality. Traditional drying methods, involving slow and manual hanging of cannabis inflorescences in controlled environments, are time-intensive and vulnerable to microbial contamination. This study explores advanced drying methods to improve efficiency and quality, compares their environmental impacts through life cycle assessment, and investigates the use of cannabis stalks for producing bio-based materials. The research is divided into five phases, covering drying optimization, quality evaluation, sustainability analysis, and waste valorization. In phase one of this study, an advanced and rapid drying technique was applied to cannabis inflorescences using a combined microwave-infrared (MI) heating system. Drying at three microwave (MW) power levels (0, 70, 140 W) with or without 70 W infrared (IR) was performed and compared with conventional controlled environmental drying (CED) at 30 °C and 60% RH. MI drying reduced drying time from 840 min to 16-200 min based on the MI power level, improved moisture diffusivity, and lowered energy consumption. It enhanced decarboxylation, increasing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from 6.31% to 16.65% and reducing tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA). Although terpene retention was significantly lower than CED, MI drying offers a faster, energy-efficient option suitable for medicinal and edible cannabis products. To address quality loss from rapid drying, phase two explored MI heating as a short-duration pretreatment (1-5 min, 70-210 W MW, 75-225 W IR), followed by conventional drying at 25 °C and 50% RH. With the increasing of MI power and time, the drying rate and THC content were increased, while reducing THCA and energy use. Optimal conditions (210 W MW, 225 W IR, 3.36 min) achieved >65% energy savings, lower equilibrium moisture content, and a 43% terpene reduction. Artificial neural network (ANN) modeling outperformed response surface methodology (RSM) in predicting response variables. While MI pretreatment enhanced drying efficiency, terpene preservation remains a challenge. The next phase explored cold plasma (CP) pretreatment of cannabis inflorescences at 300-400 W for 20-40 s. CP-pretreated samples reached lower equilibrium moisture content (10-14%) in 690-840 min, compared to 16% in 1260 min for untreated samples. CP improved moisture diffusivity, reduced energy consumption, and enhanced decarboxylation- increasing THC levels while lowering THCA, with total THC remaining stable (25.82–28.36% vs. 27.45%). Notably, CP at 400 W for 30 s preserved around 96% of total terpene content. These results highlight CP as a promising pretreatment for reducing drying time and preserving key quality attributes, especially terpenes, in cannabis processing. A life cycle assessment (LCA) using IMPACT 2002+ was conducted to compare environmental impacts of conventional drying (CED) with MI-pretreated drying (MI-CED) and CP- pretreated drying (CP-CED) methods. Both MI-CED and CP-CED significantly reduced environmental burdens, with CP-CED cutting impacts by ~50% and MI-CED by ~72% during drying. Global warming potential from greenhouse gas emissions dropped from 11.31 kg CO₂ eq. (CED) to 5.68 kg (CP-CED) and 3.25 kg (MI-CED). These results highlight the sustainability benefits of integrating advanced pretreatment technologies in cannabis drying. In the last phase of this study, cannabis stalks were characterized and valorized into cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) through alkali treatment, bleaching, and metal-salt oxidation. The stalks contained 57% cellulose and 0.078% THC, which decreased to 0.036% following mild NaOH (2%) pretreatment, demonstrating their suitability for conversion into biobased materials without regulatory constraints. The resulting CNCs exhibited a spindle-shaped morphology (280 nm in length and 9 nm in width) and a crystallinity of 72%, indicating their potential applications in bio-composites, adhesives, absorbents, coatings, and packaging materials. Overall, this thesis demonstrates that emerging drying strategies, particularly short-time CP pretreatment, effectively enhance cannabis drying efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and preserve product quality-particularly terpenes-making them promising alternatives to traditional methods for sustainable cannabis processing.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Même sujetCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→Travaux en français237 207→