MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7112504938

Body Composition, Functional, and Nutritional Characteristics of Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis

2014· article· en· W7112504938 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigiNole (Florida State University) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNutrition and Health in Aging
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBioelectrical impedance analysisOsteoarthritisOrthopedic surgeryLean body massObesityProspective cohort studyArthroplastyWeight loss
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Body composition refers to the amounts of fat and lean tissues in the body. It is a superior measurement compared to simple assessments of body weight and other anthropometrics. Osteoarthritis (OA) is an important public health problem and one of the most common causes of disability among American adults. An estimated 67 million Americans will develop OA, many of whom will require surgical intervention. The majority of patients with hip or knee OA are obese, older and sedentary. These factors would make them prone to a body composition phenotype of concurrent excess fat and low lean tissue that has been associated with unfavorable health outcomes in other cohorts of patients. Although obesity (assessed by overall body weight or its derivatives) has been extensively studied in patients with OA, only a handful of these studies have investigated fat versus lean tissue contributions to OA outcomes. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that body composition abnormalities may be caused and perpetuated by abnormal nutrition and physical function. Objectives: The overall purpose of this study was to describe body composition, functional and nutritional characteristics of patients with hip or knee OA undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery and to investigate the relationship between abnormal body composition and surgical-related outcomes. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, patients scheduled for THA or TKA due to OA were recruited from August 2013 until February 2014 from the Tallahassee Orthopedic Clinic (TOC). Patients underwent body composition assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Functional measurements included handgrip strength testing and questionnaires that comprised of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study Questionnaire, and the Falls Efficacy Scale, International (FES-I). Dietary data were collected through a 24-hour dietary recall. In a subset of patients, medical discharge summaries were analyzed to quantify surgical outcomes. Results: A total of 42 patients (66.7% females) with a mean age of 66 ± 10 years were included in this study. The body mass index (BMI) ranged from 21.5 to 55.0 kg/m2 with 69% of patients being classified as obese. A wide variability of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) was observed across the BMI spectrum. Patients reporting low back pain presented with lower FFM index (FFMI), p=0.026, as well as with significantly higher body fat percentage (p=0.049). Handgrip strength was positively correlated with FFMI (r=0.44, p=0.008), but not with other functional assessments. Total WOMAC scores were significantly correlated to FMI (r=0.34, p=0.039), while BMI trended towards significance. An overall low ADL score was observed and physical activity levels were most strongly negatively correlated with FMI (r=-0.46, p=0.006). FES-I was positively associated with numerous body composition compartments, the strongest of which was body fat percentage (r=0.48, p=0.024). In order to further explore the relationship between body composition and functional variables, individual assessments were dichotomized in function of both FM and FFM, on the basis of the idea that higher FM and lower FFM values would be associated with poorer physical function. Using this approach, different patterns of unfavorable physical function emerged among different body composition phenotypes. Overall, patterns of higher FM and lower FFM were associated with adverse outcomes. Average caloric intake was approximately 1700 kcals/day, with a mean protein consumption of 0.81 g/kg body weight/day. Protein intake was not associated with body composition variables. Conversely, iron intake was positively associated with FFMI (r=0.43, p=0.019) and average handgrip strength (r=0.43, p=0.020). Surgical outcomes were available for a small number of patients (n=16) and was not associated with any body composition, functional or nutritional characteristics. Nonetheless, pre-surgical blood creatinine (mg/dL) was positively associated with FFMI (r=0.60, p=0.040). Conclusion: The major findings of this study reveal a wide variability of body composition (FM and FFM) in patients with hip or knee OA despite BMI. Overall, FM and FFM were more strongly associated with functional assessments and low back pain compared to simple measures of body weight. We conclude that the assessment of body composition may be advantageous compared to simple anthropometric measurements when predicting poor functional status in patients with hip or knee OA. This remains to be tested in future larger studies with more in-depth and accurate body composition assessments.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,099
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,419

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigiNole (Florida State University)Même sujetNutrition and Health in AgingTravaux en français237 207