MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7112679545

Evaluation Report - Connecting the Active Quarter

2025· report· en· W7112679545 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2025
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueUrban Transport and Accessibility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesTrent UniversityNottingham Trent UniversityUniversity of Northampton
Mots-clésBiddingReal estateQuarter (Canadian coin)Process (computing)Duration (music)Estate
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Following a fourth bidding round, in March 2023, West Northamptonshire Council were awarded £642,000 to build a new 1.3 km traffic-free route including cycle parking, seating and wayfinding (future delivery) within Delapre Park, accessible for those walking, wheeling and cycling. The scheme was bid for in response to previous insight from visitors who said the park becomes inaccessible for large periods of the year following rainfall. It was anticipated that the new paths would enable residents living in Far Cotton and the town centre to connect with employment opportunities, such as Brackmills Industrial Estate and the University of Northampton, as well as supporting the ongoing wellbeing and social prescribing projects at Delapré Abbey. Evaluation Design: Construction of the new routes and covered cycle parking were completed in Autumn 2024. The current evaluation was conducted between March and April 2025 to allow park visitors time to experience the new paths before seeking their feedback. The current evaluation is primarily a process evaluation because at least 12-months post-scheme completion is required to provide a robust outcome evaluation. Therefore, we provide visitors’ perceptions of the new paths (process evaluation) and only descriptive summaries of footfall and unique visits (outcome evaluation). This approach aligns with the monitoring and evaluation guidance of Active Travel England. Findings: Overall, our findings suggest that the new paths have provided a positive experience for the Park’s visitors with the wider and firmer surface making it easier for people to use year-round. However, a small number of visitors were still experiencing accessibility issues due to the loose top-dressing. Forty-seven percent of survey respondents who use the park for active travel journeys said the new paths increased the frequency of their active travel journeys. Twenty-three percent and 45% of online and intercept survey respondents, respectively, said the paths had or would increase their visits to the park and this was mainly because they would not get as muddy or feel as vulnerable to slips, trips, and falls. Wider accessibility issues within the park, raised by visitors, focused on the need to upgrade other mud-trodden paths (such as the entry point to Delapre Lake), the presence of localised flooding (notably in the Outer Garden), and the distance of Disabled Bay parking spaces from Delapré Abbey, which require further focused investigation outside of this project. The provision of more seating had been a long-standing request from the Park’s visitors, so the inclusion of seating within the scheme was welcomed but requires some amendments in future projects to meet Government guidance to ensure adequate resting places are at least provided at 150 metre intervals(1). The plans for updated wayfinding across the park to replace the multiple forms of outdated wayfinding was welcomed by respondents. Respondents wanted the new wayfinding to align with best practice for accessibility, use materials that were in-keeping with the Park’s natural environment and heritage, raise awareness for the different users of the park, and identify the distances of different looped routes in the park. Based on these findings, the evaluators propose the following recommendations: Short-term recommendations • Monitor the compaction of the top-dressing throughout summer to determine whether remedial work is required to remove excessive build-up, subject to funding being available. • Future schemes should relocate or add additional benches to meet the recommended 150-metre maximum spacing. • Identify additional funding options to install additional seating so all paths are serviced with adequate places to rest, such as donated memorial benches. • Present the draft wayfinding designs to park users to gain further feedback before installation. • Ensure the bollards at Eagle Drive have at least 1.5 metre spacing between them. • During the installation of new wayfinding, remove outdated wayfinding to reduce visual clutter as it effects the visitor experience. Medium-term recommendations • Conduct a follow-up assessment of the automated count data to determine the impact of the new paths on footfall. Further recommendations • Explore the feasibility of extending the new paths up to the edge of Delapre Lake to create a viewing platform as this is a common destination and resting point for people who visit the park. • Explore the feasibility of further path improvements around Delapre Lake to create a full looped path. • Explore the feasibility of path improvements through the Outer Garden to protect the ground from heavy footfall and vehicles. • Continue to proactively engage residents in discussions to ensure their parks meet their wants and needs. • Produce and communicate a full accessibility audit of the park so people can plan their visits. (1) Department for Transport (2021). Inclusive Mobility: A guide to best practice on access to pedestrian and transport infrastructure. UK Government. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inclusive-mobility-making-transport-accessible-for-passengers-and-pedestrians

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,071
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,197
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,081
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,377

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0710,197
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0070,004
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0810,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,227
Tête enseignante GPT0,424
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)→Même sujetUrban Transport and Accessibility→Travaux en français237 207→