Resistance and relational activism: exploring teacher education at the interstices
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For a decade the teacher education sector in England has been in the hands of DfE policy makers who view teacher training as a market to be manipulated, as illustrated by the results of the 2022 Initial Teacher Training (ITT) accreditation process. In 2015 Ellis and McNichol argued that as a sector the universities had not recognised or responded with enough force to the threats of the policy implementation of the ideologically based transition from teacher education to teacher training in England. The lack of attrition gained by the 2013-14 BERA-RSA Inquiry into Research and the Teaching Profession also indicated that research in the field typically fails to gain the attention of the DfE. If we are to believe the dominant DfE narrative the most attractive feature of the current teacher education map is the ‘golden thread’ of ITT, the Early Career Framework (ECF) and National Professional Qualifications (NPQs), all offered by the designated providers representing a pincer movement on the sector in which many teacher educators feel they now have limited agency. <br/> <br/>Teacher education at the interstices<br/>In this increasingly prescriptive teacher training landscape, it is worth noticing forms of teacher education and learning undertaken in the interstices, including those engaging educators within and beyond the 11-16 school sector. Social media is used as a mechanism to bring people together, share knowledge and approaches, and to both share and challenge the dominant narratives. Teacher professional development gatherings framed as TeachMeets, unconferences and festivals have proliferated. Networks have emerged which support the wellbeing and progression of educators in minority groups, and those at transitional stages in their careers. The pandemic created new momentum in many of these as well as ensuring that they occupied the online spaces used by educators.<br/><br/>In this workshop participants will explore the proposition that our traditional academic approaches to influence policy and to construct practice in teacher education are falling short and new ways of being are needed and being created in the interstices. We will draw on narratives, provocations and freshest thinking to explore the extent to which these interstitial spaces might be experienced as resistance and/or relational activism.<br/><br/>The workshop will be in four parts:<br/><br/>Video narratives. Short video narratives of interstitial teacher ‘education’ from the doctoral research of four members of our own university-hosted network will be shared (Sidebottom, 2021, Holme, 2019, Mycroft, 2020, Tremayne, 2021). The researchers will provide fresh perspectives on their work and its current and potential implications.<br/>Conceptual provocations. Key ideas from three non-disciplinary sources will be introduced; how to resist, challenge the system and influence decision making (Bolton, 2017), conversations to restore hope to the future (Wheatley, 2009) and relational activism (O'Shaughnessy and Huddart Kennedy 2010). <br/>Personal and professional narratives. Using a co-coaching approach (developed through 2020-22 Erasmus project designed in response to the educational challenges of the pandemic) participants will be invited to contribute their own narratives. This will offer an opportunity to consider the realities of practice, to reflect, to respond and to begin to re-imagine what might be possible. <br/>Freshest thinking. Drawing on the principles of the thinking environment (Kline, xxx) the workshop will close with a thinking round in which participants will offer their freshest thinking. <br/>Anticipated outcomes<br/><br/>Workshop participants will be invited to video record their own narratives and freshest thinking at their convenience, and to share these with the facilitators. A collated and edited video will be produced and published through the university research and practice centre (permissions and consent will be gained). A BERA blogpost will be submitted to introduce the video and to encourage dissemination. An opportunity to form a new teacher education network associated with the themes of this workshop will be developed. <br/><br/>References<br/>BERA-RSA (2014) Research and the Teaching Profession: Building the Capacity for a Self-Improving Education System, British Educational Research Association https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/BERA-RSA-Research-Teaching-Profession-FULL-REPORT-for-web.pdf<br/>Bolton, M. 2017. How to Resist: Turn Protest to Power. Bloomsbury, London <br/>Ellis, V. and McNicholl, J. (2015), Transforming Teacher Education: Reconfiguring The Academic Work, Bloomsbury, London and New York, NY.<br/>Holme, R. 2019. An investigation into teacher-initiated or DIY Professional Development: the push and pull of teacher Professional Development, EdD Thesis, University of Dundee<br/>Kline, N. 2002. Time to Think: Listening to Ignite the Human Mind, Cassell Illustrated, Octupus Publishing Group Ltd, London<br/>Mycroft, H.L. 2020. Strange Times: The creation of a nomadic community education Imaginary. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. <br/>O’Shaughnessy, S. and Huddart Kennedy, E. 2010. Relational activism: Reimagining Women’s Environmental Work As Cultural change, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 35(4) <br/>Sidebottom, K. 2021. Rhizomes, assemblages and nomad war machines – re-imagining curriculum development for posthuman times. PhD thesis, Lancaster University<br/>Tremayne, D. 2021. More than just a chat? Online teacher-learning communities as sites for professional learning and teacher agency, PhD thesis, Leeds Beckett University<br/>Wheatley, M.J. 2009. Turning to each other: Simple conversations to restore hope to the future (2nd ed), Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. Oakland, CA
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».