Awareness and perception of electronic cigarettes / Khadijah Ahmad
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Electronic cigarettes also known as e-cigarettes were first invented by the Chinese Pharmacist's Hon Lik in early 2000s. It has been claimed as an alternative for tobacco product since it is marketed as tobacco-free product, which mimic the characters of tobacco cigarettes. Basically, electronic cigarettes consist of power source, an atomizer which act as heating element that vaporized the solution, the solution also known as e-liquid. Usage of electronic cigarettes is increasing over time. At the moment data on awareness and perception of electronic cigarettes is still limited. The perception of the pharmacist's role in smoking cessation and disseminating information on electronic cigarettes is still not known.The aim of this study is to determine the awareness and perception of electronic cigarettes and to investigate the perception of the public on the pharmacist's role in smoking cessation.A surveyed was conducted in Batu Pahat Johor which consisted of 69 respondents. The instrument consist of four-parts self-administered 39 items questionnaire consisted of demographic, usage of conventional and electronic cigarettes, awareness and perception of electronic cigarettes and pharmacist' role in smoking cessation. The respondents were given 20 minutes to answer the survey. The result were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Majority of the respondents were male (76.8%), ranging from 20-30 years old (44.9%) with SPM as the highest level of education (36.2%). 52.5 % of respondents were conventional cigarette users and only 13 % from them used electronic cigarettes. The respondents, (95.9%) were aware of electronic cigarettes. Three quarter (75.4%) of the respondents do not believe electronic cigarettes can be used as a smoking cessation tool and almost a quarter (23.2%) believe it can be use as smoking cessation tool. Almost half (43.5%) of the respondents believe electronic cigarette is as safe as conventional cigarette and a slightly higher percentage (49.3%) considered electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarettes are both harmful. Majority of the respondents agreed or strongly agree that pharmacist can advice you on smoking cessation (82.6%) and on safety and efficacy of electronic cigarettes (81.2%). Respondents also agree or strongly agree that pharmacist can provide smoking cessation counseling (86.9%) and smoking cessation medication (79.7%). Based on the result from this study, most of the respondents were aware of electronic cigarettes and have different perception towards electronic cigarettes. It was found that, majority of the respondents agreed that pharmacist play a role in smoking cessation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».