A Blueprint for Digital Tools in Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment: The Development and Validation of the Spatial Performance Assessment for Cognitive Evaluation (SPACE)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As the global population ages, the prevalence of dementia continues to rise, creating an urgent demand for tools that enable early detection and intervention. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is typically preceded by a stage known as Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), which is characterised by subtle but measurable declines in cognitive function that do not yet interfere with daily activities. Among other regions, MCI and AD primarily affect the medial temporal lobe, including the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, which are central to spatial coding and position tracking during navigation. The early degeneration of regions supporting spatial navigation provides a strong theoretical basis for targeting navigation abilities in the early detection of cognitive impairment. Yet, traditional cognitive screening assessments widely used in clinical practice often neglect spatial navigation abilities and instead focus on memory, executive function, and language. These tools may lack sensitivity to early cognitive changes, require trained administrators, and are susceptible to biases related to education, language, and culture. As a consequence, many individuals are only diagnosed after time- intensive neuropsychological assessments that require specialised personnel and often involve costly and invasive procedures such as neuroimaging or biomarker testing. By then, symptoms are usually apparent, and interventions are less effective. Digital technologies offer a means to deliver standardised, scalable, and sensitive assessments, including spatial navigation tasks, to better detect early cognitive impairment. Although several digital tools targeting navigation have demonstrated potential for detecting cognitive impairment, few have undergone the rigorous validation needed for clinical or public health use. This thesis presents the development and validation of SPACE, a tablet-based tool designed to assess spatial navigation deficits as early markers of cognitive impairment. Validation was conducted through a structured multimodal pathway integrating usability, cognitive performance, neural correlates, and diagnostic evaluation. The first step of the validation pathway emphasises iterative usability studies as a key component of the validation process, enabling continuous optimisation of the digital tool through both subjective and objective measures. Article I tested design features of SPACE across three studies to enhance accessibility, including a simplified control interface to reduce motor and cognitive demands, a rotational aid to support heading estimation, and a simplified spatial configuration of the tasks. These adaptations improved accessibility for older adults while maintaining sensitivity to cognitive variation and established a user-centred foundation for digital cognitive assessments intended across broad age groups. Article II assessed whether SPACE tasks predicted cognitive impairment as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), while accounting for age, gender, and modifiable dementia risk factors. Two tasks in SPACE (i.e., pointing and perspective taking) predicted MoCA scores, while other navigation-based tasks captured variance independent of MoCA. A further analysis revealed a dissociation, as some participants performed well on MoCA but poorly on navigation tasks, and vice versa, suggesting that SPACE taps into complementary cognitive domains not fully captured by conventional screening tools. Building on these findings, Article III extended the validation to neural correlates of spatial navigation by examining whether SPACE performance explained variance in hippocampal volume beyond full neuropsychological assessment, including the MoCA. Here, the performance of two navigation-based tasks in SPACE (i.e., path integration and mapping) showed significant associations with hippocampal volume, providing anatomical validation that SPACE targets brain systems known to be affected early in AD progression. While the previous studies focused on healthy participants, Article IV evaluated the diagnostic classification performance of SPACE across clinical stages of cognitive impairment, as defined by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. SPACE demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy even when discriminating between adjacent, subtler stages, while maintaining sensitivity and specificity comparable to, or exceeding, those of existing digital tools. Moreover, a shortened version, sSPACE, maintained robust classification performance while reducing administration time, offering a format more suitable for in-clinic use and with potential applicability to large-scale screening efforts. Taken together, the work presented in this thesis establishes SPACE as a psychometrically robust, biologically anchored, and clinically promising tool for the early detection of cognitive impairment. By targeting spatial navigation deficits and adopting a multimodal validation framework, this thesis offers a methodological blueprint for the responsible development and validation of future digital cognitive assessments aimed at earlier identification of individuals at risk of cognitive impairment, when interventions may still provide meaningful benefit.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,068 | 0,119 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».