Artificial Intelligence Applications in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Global Scoping Review of Diagnostic, Symptom-Based, and Outcome Prediction Approaches
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) represents a significant global health burden, characterized by complex diagnostic and management challenges. Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents a powerful opportunity to enhance clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes by leveraging complex health data. Objectives: This scoping review aims to systematically map the existing literature on AI applications in COPD. The primary objective is to identify, categorize, and summarize research into three key domains: (1) Diagnosis, (2) Clinical Symptoms, and (3) Clinical Outcomes. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A comprehensive search of major scientific databases, including PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, was performed. The Population–Concept–Context (PCC) criteria included patients with COPD (Population), the use of AI (Concept), and applications in healthcare settings (Context). A global search strategy was employed with no geographic restrictions. Studies were included if they were original research articles published in English. The extracted data were charted and classified into the three predefined categories. Results: A total of 120 studies representing global distribution were included. Most datasets originated from Asia (predominantly China and India) and Europe (notably Spain and the UK), followed by North America (USA and Canada). There was a notable scarcity of data from South America and Africa. The findings indicate a strong trend towards the use of deep learning (DL), particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for medical imaging, and tree-based machine learning (ML) models like CatBoost for clinical data. The most common data types were electronic health records, chest CT scans, and audio recordings. While diagnostic applications are well-established and report high accuracy, research into symptom analysis and phenotype identification is an emerging area. Key gaps were identified in the lack of prospective validation and clinical implementation studies. Conclusions: Current evidence shows that AI offers promising applications for COPD diagnosis, outcome prediction, and symptom analysis, but most reported models remain at an early stage of maturity due to methodological limitations and limited external validation. Future research should prioritize rigorous clinical evaluation, the development of explainable and trustworthy AI systems, and the creation of standardized, multi-modal datasets to support reliable and safe translation of these technologies into routine practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».