Decoding Speckles, Discovering Treasures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the past decade, machine learning has become an important part of many fields in the physical sciences. While the success of these methods is undeniable, they are often used as "black boxes" which limits their interpretability. This thesis explores the use of computational methods and machine learning in exoplanet high-contrast imaging (HCI), a technique that directly detects exoplanets by resolving their light from that of their host star. This thesis focuses on removing and quantifying speckle noise, a type of systematic noise caused by imperfections in telescope optics and atmospheric turbulence. The methods developed in this thesis not only achieve better results but also contribute to a better understanding of the data and the underlying physics. The first contribution is a new statistical framework for the robust quantification of HCI detection limits. The method is based on parametric bootstrapping and generalizes the commonly used standard to account for non-Gaussian speckle noise. By comparing detection limits under different noise assumptions, we find that non-Gaussian noise can bias detection limits by approximately one magnitude. The second contribution is the introduction of 4S (Signal-Safe Speckle Subtraction), an explainable machine learning algorithm for speckle subtraction. 4S not only outperforms the commonly used baseline methods, but also explores new ways to incorporate domain knowledge into the algorithm. Using saliency maps, 4S provides insight into the underlying noise structures, revealing a physical correspondence with known speckle behavior. The improvement provided by \fours is largest at small separations from the star. This enhancement enables the detection of the exoplanet AF Lep b in archival data from 2011, over a decade before its subsequent discovery. This additional astrometric data point helps us to significantly improve the constraints on the orbit and mass of the companion. The third contribution is the first uniform reanalysis of the entire NaCo L'-band archive. Using 4S on these data, we identified four additional known companions in archival data taken before their official discovery, as well as sixteen new companion candidates. Future observations with ERIS will confirm or refute whether the candidates are bona fide companions. A quantitative comparison of the detection limits of coronagraphic and non-coronagraphic datasets shows that the vortex coronagraph in \naco, yields shallower detection limits than the non-coronagraphic data. This performance loss is partially due to the effectiveness of the data post-processing -- a result that underlines the importance of considering algorithm-instrument synergies during instrument design. Overall, this thesis presents a foundation for more transparent, physically interpretable, and statistically sound exoplanet imaging analyses. It paves the way for both deeper detection limits in existing data and more effective use of upcoming facilities, such as METIS and PCS, at the ELT.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».