MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7115009818 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf116.077

77 Understanding newcomers’ experience in accessing healthcare services for their children upon arriving in Canada

2025· article· en· W7115009818 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMigration, Health and Trauma
Établissements canadiensHorizon Health NetworkUniversity of New Brunswick
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth careImmigrationQualitative researchHealthcare policyHealth policyConvention

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Access to healthcare services is a fundamental right for all children, as outlined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which mandates governments to ensure equitable health rights for every child, including newcomers. However, newcomer families often encounter unique barriers when trying to access paediatric healthcare services upon arriving in Canada. This study focuses on understanding these challenges in New Brunswick, a region experiencing an increase in immigrant populations. By examining the healthcare access experiences of newcomer families, this research identifies gaps within the healthcare system and explores how these may impact the health outcomes and overall development of newcomer children. The study highlights the need for policy adjustments and support services to facilitate easier healthcare access for these families and promote their children's well-being​. Objectives This study aims to: Examine the experiences of newcomer families in accessing healthcare services for their children in New Brunswick. Identify the specific barriers, including cultural and language-related challenges, that hinder effective access to paediatric healthcare. Assess the current healthcare system’s responsiveness to the unique needs of newcomer children and their families. Provide recommendations for healthcare policy adjustments and support services that could enhance access and ensure equitable healthcare for all children in the province. Design/Methods A qualitative design was used to capture the lived experiences of newcomer mothers regarding their children’s healthcare access in New Brunswick. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants who met the criteria of being recent immigrants with at least one child. The interviews were designed to explore themes surrounding healthcare access, including health status and personal experiences, comparisons between healthcare systems, available support services, and perceived policy gaps. Data were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring themes and subthemes, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the obstacles these families face. The resulting themes allowed for an in-depth examination of both the practical and emotional dimensions of healthcare access challenges. This method also facilitated the gathering of insights into the systemic barriers newcomer families encounter, as well as the resources they believe would support more equitable access to paediatric healthcare services. Results The analysis of interview data revealed five major themes that encapsulate the experiences of newcomer families regarding healthcare access for their children in New Brunswick. The first theme, Access to Healthcare, highlighted significant issues related to health literacy, understanding the provincial healthcare system, and initial navigation challenges. Participants frequently reported language barriers and difficulty obtaining information about available services, often leading to delayed or missed appointments. The second theme, Health Status and Experiences, described a wide range of health concerns unique to immigrant children, such as under-addressed mental health needs and chronic conditions that required prompt attention upon arrival. Comparison and Gaps in the Healthcare System emerged as a third theme, where mothers contrasted New Brunswick’s healthcare with systems in their countries of origin, noting particular deficiencies in responsiveness and culturally appropriate care. The fourth theme, Support Services and Policy Changes, emphasized the importance of supportive resources, such as language interpretation, cultural competence training for healthcare providers, and expanded insurance coverage. The final theme, Miscellaneous Mentions, captured additional personal anecdotes, shedding light on individualized yet impactful experiences, including the role of community organizations in bridging access gaps. These findings underscore the pressing need for system adjustments in New Brunswick to foster more accessible, responsive, and inclusive paediatric healthcare for newcomer families​. Conclusion The study reveals significant barriers that newcomer families face in accessing paediatric healthcare in New Brunswick, affecting children’s health and well-being. Findings emphasize the need for policy changes, such as improved cultural competency training, language services, and expanded support networks, to ensure that healthcare services are more inclusive. Addressing these gaps will not only enhance healthcare accessibility for newcomer children but also safeguard their development and long-term health outcomes in the province.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,070
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,508

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,006
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetMigration, Health and Trauma→Travaux en français237 207→