73 Leveraging data-driven machine learning for enhanced paediatric case definitions in Severe Acute Respiratory Infections (SARI) surveillance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Acute respiratory infections are one of the leading causes of death globally in both children and adults. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a standardized case definition for Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) to detect and monitor respiratory virus outbreaks. However, previous studies have demonstrated limited accuracy of the WHO SARI case definition to detect viral respiratory infections in children. Objectives To develop a machine learning (ML)-based clinical prediction model/case definition to detect SARI in children and youth hospitalized with an acute respiratory infection using machine learning. Design/Methods Children and youth under 18 years hospitalized with a suspected or confirmed respiratory infections at two large Canadian children's hospitals were included. Demographics, clinical symptoms, and microbiologic testing were extracted and preprocessed to create model inputs. Acute respiratory infections were defined through microbiological viral tests. SARI case definition was developed using an L1-regularized logistic regression (LASSO) approach to assess positive respiratory virus results for hospitalized children. The sample was split randomly into 70% training and 30% testing sub-samples through set.seed() function in R. We considered 18 socio-demographic and symptom indicators for the model. The ML-based case definition was trained using 10-fold cross-validation on the training set, and performance metrics, including model discrimination, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, were assessed on the test set. Results Overall, 1887 participants (1135 male, 752 female) were included in the analysis, with a median age of 2.5 years. Most (86%) of participants had a positive viral test, of which 38% were positive for RSV. The most common reported symptoms included cough (83%), increased work of breathing (68%), reported fever (70%), and nasal congestion (61%). The final case definition included following variables: reported fever, cough, nasal congestion, dehydration, increased work of breathing, tachypnea, irritability, poor feeding, wheezing and vomiting. Cough and sore throat were the most important positive and negative predictors, respectively. The model achieved an accuracy of 73% (95% CI: 70-75%), sensitivity of 77% (95% CI 74-79%) and specificity of 47% (95% CI 39-55%) maximizing Youden index, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 64% (95% CI 59-69%). Conclusion The novel paediatric ML-based SARI case definition had superior performance compared to the WHO SARI case definition. This study highlights a promising opportunity to use machine learning to generate case definitions which could be embedded into electronic medical records to enhance surveillance for novel and emerging infections globally in paediatrics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,020 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».