Overcoming barriers to coaching success: exploring the developmental networks of elite women coaches
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Despite the rapid emerge of professional women's sport over the last decade, the number of women in coaching positions remains low.The underrepresentation of women in leadership and coaching roles has impacted the amount of available women role models, decreasing opportunities for younger, aspiring women in the coaching domain.Notably, within the literature, more research has focused on the problems, issues, and barriers that impact women coaches' careers, in comparison to factors that both support and help advance them.The developmental network perspective offers an understanding of how multiple individuals may impact the personal and professional development of others by considering the constellation of their developmental relationships.However, research using the developmental network perspective in women's coaching is scarce.As such, the purpose of this study was to explore the developmental networks of elite women coaches.Participants included five full-time North American professional women coaches, with an average of 14.2 years of coaching experience in three different team sports (both men's and women's).Data were acquired through individual semi-structured interviews with each participant.During the interview, participants were asked to construct a visual representation of their developmental network using a relational map, followed by a series of questions relating to their map guided by the primary researcher.All data was analyzed following reflexive thematic analysis guidelines (Braun et al., 2016(Braun et al., , 2023)).The findings indicated that coaches acquired a core network of developmental relationships (e.g., coaches, family, management, mentors) that collectively contributed to their career growth and development as a coach.Coaches described their networks as a critical part of their professional development, providing them with a foundation of career (e.g., coaching knowledge and development, opportunities, modeling) and psychosocial support (e.g., confidence, autonomy, trust).More specifically, coaches highlighted the value in the diversity of their networks, describing the distinct contribution each member made in their overall development.Taken together, the women coaches' networks helped to alleviate many of the challenges they faced in the industry and guided them in their path to becoming a professional coach.Results from this study demonstrate how women were able to attain top leadership positions in sport, illustrating the potential for women coaches to serve as visible and influential role models who can inspire and pave the way for other women in the industry.Importantly, these findings enhance our understanding of the career experiences and development of women coaches through the developmental network perspective, providing a unique theoretical approach to coach learning and progression. To my supervisor, Dr. Gordon Bloom.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle