Charting the impact of ovarian hormone depletion on brain structure in the ovariectomized mouse model of menopause
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Menopause, whether resulting from natural endocrine aging or clinical interventions, is a universal transition marking the end of reproductive capacity in women.While a normal biological process, menopause has been associated with neurological symptoms, diminished quality of life, and increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease.Yet, the mechanisms by which ovarian hormone depletion impacts the brain remain poorly understood, in part because of the difficulty in disentangling menopause-specific effects from confounding variables like chronological aging and exogenous hormone use, and in part due to methodological inconsistencies across studies.Existing neuroimaging studies in women report highly heterogeneous findings, limiting our understanding of how menopause influences brain structure and whether these changes reflect vulnerability or resilience.To address these gaps, we employed a well-powered, longitudinal, whole-brain voxel-wise analysis in a controlled preclinical model.Using the bilateral ovariectomized (BLO) mouse model of late human menopause, we longitudinally investigated structural brain changes across four timepoints using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (100 μm³ voxels, 7T Bruker scanner).Age-matched, sham-operated female mice served as controls (SHAM) (n=90).Circulating pituitary gonadotropin hormone levels (luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to confirm the endocrine status of the animals.We found that BLO mice exhibited increased brain volumes between 30 and 60 days post-ovariectomy, particularly in hormone-sensitive regions such as the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and association cortices.By 90 days, brain volumes in these regions returned to levels comparable to the SHAM group, suggesting the engagement of endogenous compensatory mechanisms and structural adaptation.BLO mice exhibited persistently elevated gonadotropin levels irrespective of time since ovariectomy.Brains, Healthy Lives fellowship and a scholarship from le Réseau de Bio-Imagerie du Québec.First and foremost, I extend my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Mallar Chakravarty.When I joined your lab, I hoped to gain experience in animal work and computational science, but you taught me far more than that.You taught me to think critically, to question assumptions, and, above all, to be self-reflective.When you first interviewed me, I asked you what you considered your greatest strength as a supervisor, and you modestly replied that you are not a micromanager.But over time, I discovered that your strengths go well beyond that: your patience, understanding, and perspective have shaped how I approach not just research, but learning itself.You showed me that the feeling of being behind is often what drives us forward, and you encouraged me to trust my abilities and my voice as a young researcher.You have created a collaborative and supportive environment at the Cobra Lab, where new ideas and growth are always encouraged.Thank you for guiding me through this chapter of my journey, and for continuing to inspire me as I grow both personally and professionally.I look forward to continuing to work with you.I am equally grateful to all the members of the Cobra Lab for fostering such a generous and collaborative atmosphere.I have been consistently inspired by everyone's willingness to lend a hand and go above and beyond to support one another, a quality I will strive to carry with me throughout my career.In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Stephanie Tullo for mentoring me with kindness and patience, for sharing your expertise, and for guiding me through the challenges of data analysis and presentation.Thank you to Medhinee Malvankar for being an invaluable source of support during the planning and execution of my project, List of
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».