Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Illidops planiscapus (Tobias, 1976) Apanteles planiscapus Tobias, 1976: 248–249. Species concept Our species concept is based on the information available in Tobias (1976), Tobias & Kotenko (1986) and Papp (1988). → *. Ecology / host information Tentative information provided in the original description, check remarks for more details. Distribution PAL: Russia (DA). Molecular data No molecular data available. Remarks Holotype female, ZIN. Country of type locality: Russia. Type depository inferred from Tobias & Kotenko (1986) by Fernandez-Triana et al. (2020). Tobias provided a tentative host identification for the holotype of I. planiscapus (Tobias, 1976), although he placed a question mark in front of it, so it is rather uncertain. Tobias’ (1976) putative host of this species is Talis quercella ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), a Crambidae, collected from a Poaceae grass in the Caucasus region. This species was transferred to Illidops by Papp (1988), but he already stated that his placement of this species is rather provisional, as he only knew it from its original description. Tobias & Kotenko (1986) did not consider it part of the butalidis group, but rather proposed a new planiscapus group. We consider that the morphology potentially does not match the set of characters diagnostic of the butalidis and suevus groups in the past, and our more current concept of Illidops. The species has a much less angled radial vein (r) and it is not “slanting outwards” (Mason 1981) as it does in most species of Illidops (illustrated in Fig. 242; Tobias & Kotenko 1986: 751, drawing 2). We cannot verify this and we do not have specimens available resembling this species, or access to the holotype. We are not satisfied with the placement of this species in Illidops. However, similar to Papp (1988), we cannot transfer this species to any genus as we have not seen any material and the original description is not sufficient to place it with certainty in any other genus. The species is partially illustrated in Tobias & Kotenko (1986: 751). Original description sensu Tobias (1976) (translated from Russian and with updated morphological terminology) Female. 3.5 mm. Malar distance equal to basal width of mandible; face in upper part with shining tubercle, face height 1.5× its width; distance between tentorial pits 3× distance between tentorial pit to eye margin. Scape strongly compressed from sides so that its length is about same as its width frontally but looking 3× as long when seen laterally; length of F14 and F15 1.3 × their width. Fore wing veins C+SC+R thickened; fore wing vein 1cu-a arising from around basal third of 1st discal cell. Length of metafemur 4.5× its width. T1 more or less barrel-shaped, with its anterior (strongly) and posterior (slightly) narrowed, T1 length equal to T1 greatest width (centrally); T1 and T2 with central impression on its posterior half; ovipositor sheaths slightly longer than half of metatibia. Sculpture. Head mildly punctured, slightly shining, antennal sockets smooth; mesoscutum roughly punctured, without granular microsculpture, shining between punctures, especially on sides; scutellum slightly punctured, shining; mesopleura anteriorly punctured, posteriorly smooth; mesonotum punctured; propodeum roughly wrinkly-punctured, T1 and T2 densely wrinkly-punctured, T3 with soft granular punctures, shining, other tergites slightly rough, shining. Anteromesoscutum with sparse setae, thickened before scutellum and on anterolateral corners of scutellum. Coloration. Femora, except for base and apex of profemur, apex of mesofemur, metafemur medially, tibiae and tarsi of all legs, except brown apex of metatibia, yellowish-brown; veins C+SC+R and pterostigma, except for its brown margins, yellow. The male is unknown. Holotype: female, Dagestan, Makhachkala, steppe grass moth (? Talis quercella Schiff.) on wild grasses, 4 VIII 1972 (Krasova).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».