MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7115196150 · doi:10.26186/150328

National Geochemical Survey of Australia The Mercury Concentrations Dataset

2025· dataset· en· W7115196150 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeoscience Australia · 2025
Typedataset
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMercury (programming language)SedimentRegolithHydrology (agriculture)MERCUREDrainage basin

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 'National Geochemical Survey of Australia: The Geochemical Atlas of Australia' was published in July 2011 along with a digital copy of the NGSA geochemical dataset (http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2011.020). The NGSA project is described here: www.ga.gov.au/ngsa. The present dataset contains additional geochemical data obtained on NGSA samples: the Mercury Concentrations Dataset.<br>Abstract:Almost 2400 new total mercury (Hg) analyses were obtained on catchment outlet sediment samples from the NGSA regolith archive to document the range and patterns of Hg concentrations in the surface regolith and their relationships to geology and anthropogenic activity. The selected samples included 1214 NGSA Top Outlet Sediment (TOS) samples taken from 0 to 10 cm depth, and 1182 Bottom Outlet Sediment (BOS) samples taken, on average, from 60 to 80 cm depth. This included 1149 sites with both TOS and BOS analysed. Only the sieved &lt;75 µm (or ‘fine’) fractions were analysed in this study. In total, 2396 new Hg concentrations were obtained from 1141 NGSA catchments (~10% of which were sampled in duplicate).<br>Mercury concentration analyses were performed by James Taylor under the supervision of A/ Prof Larissa Schneider at the School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University. Mercury analyses were conducted using a tri-cell Direct Mercury Analyzer (tri-cell DMA-80; Milestone, Bergamo, Italy) on approximately 100 mg of sample weighed in nickel boats. The instrument was calibrated with aqueous Hg standard for AAS Sigma Aldrich TraceCERT® (1000 mg/L Hg in nitric acid). A calibration curve was constructed by plotting the absorbances of standards against Hg concentrations in nanograms, which was considered valid for an R2 value of 0.99 or higher. The DMA-80 determines total Hg mass through a sequence of thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrometry. Samples were analysed using the USEPA method 7473 (USEPA, 1998), with a (mass) limit of detection of 0.01 ng Hg.<br>After every tenth sample, a replicate sample was analysed. When replicate recovery exceeded a variance of 10% compared to the original sample, a third replicate was run. At least two blanks and two Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) were analysed for every 40 samples. One hundred and thirty-eight analyses of National Institute of Standards and Technology SRM NIST-2706 (New Jersey soil) yielded a Hg concentration of 133.7 ± 14.2 ng/g (mean ± 2 SD), resulting in an RSD of 5.3%, compared to the certified value of 132.9 ± 3.3 ng/g (mean ± 2 SD), resulting in an analytical bias (recovery) of 100.6 ± 10.7% (mean ± 2 SD). Twenty-six analyses of Environment Canada SRM WQB-1 (Lake Ontario sediment) yielded a Hg concentration of 1135.1 ± 36.2 ng/g (mean ± 2 SD), resulting in an RSD of 1.6%, compared to the certified value of 1060 ± 250 ng/g (mean ± 2 SD), resulting in an analytical bias of 107.1 ± 3.4% (mean ± 2 SD). Fifty-four analyses of National Institute of Standards and Technology SRM NIST-1646a (estuarine sediment) yielded a Hg concentration of 35.4 ± 6.4 ng/g (mean ± 2 SD), resulting in an RSD of 9.1%, compared to the non-certified value of 40 ng/g (mean), resulting in an analytical bias of 88.5 ± 16.0% (mean ± 2 SD). Finally, 142 replicate analyses of internal project standard NGSA sample 2007190264002 yielded a Hg concentration of 9.2 ± 2.5 ng/g (mean ± 2SD), resulting in an RSD of 13.6%, which can be taken as a proxy for precision on matrix-matched samples for the project.<br>The results show a range of Hg concentrations (ng/g) in the NGSA TOS and BOS &lt;75 µm fraction samples across the continent:● Hg in TOS &lt;75 µm (N = 1214): Min = 0.97; Med ± Robust SD = 17.17 ± 12.48; Mean ± SD = 23.52 ± 27.53; Max = 556.00● Hg in BOS &lt;75 µm (N = 1182): Min = 0.90; Med ± Robust SD = 13.69 ± 11.40; Mean ± SD = 19.13 ± 22.30; Max = 525.28These new data allow the construction of continental-scale regolith Hg concentration maps of Australia for topsoil and subsoil and can be used to understand contributions of Hg from underlying bedrock (including Hg-bearing mineralisation), wind-blown dust and possibly from anthropogenic sources (industrial, transport, agriculture, waste handling).<br>The complete dataset is available to download as a comma separated values (CSV) file from Geoscience Australia's website (http://dx.doi.org/10.26186/150328). The data will be used in a forthcoming publication to analyse various sources, sinks and pathways for Hg cycling in the Australian near-surface environment (Schneider et al., https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11189). Alternatively, the new Hg data can be downloaded from and viewed on the GA Portal (https://portal.ga.gov.au/).<br>

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,135
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGeoscience AustraliaTravaux en français237 207