MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7115809292

Perinatal Care for Women Living with HIV in Ontario

2019· dissertation· en· W7115809292 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2019
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueQualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth careEthnographyChildbirthPsychological interventionQualitative researchHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Ideology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

My doctoral research begins from the standpoint of pregnant women and mothers living with HIV in Ontario, Canada and explores the concerns that women living with HIV have as they navigate healthcare during pregnancy, childbirth, and early postpartum. Moving beyond a description or abstracted theorization of women’s experiences, I have used institutional ethnography to explicate how women’s concerns are connected to and organized by ruling relations such as the ideological discourses that underpin the work practices of healthcare providers operating within healthcare institutions. This dissertation follows three “threads” that were discovered in the overall institutional ethnographic inquiry, and that form the basis of three manuscripts. The first thread (Chapter Three) focuses on HIV disclosure, which all women who participated in this research expressed as a concern, and uncovers how the issue of HIV disclosure is accounted for in healthcare providers’ work activities. In this analysis, I show how both the women’s and healthcare provider’s concerns about and actions related to HIV disclosure are connected to discourses such as “fear of contagion” and “AIDS hysteria” that continue to permeate public consciousness. The second thread (Chapter Four) focuses on the discourse of “risk” as organizing women’s experiences and healthcare providers’ work, which became visible through medications women were prescribed, the prenatal clinic appointment schedule women were expected to follow, and the medical interventions that were applied to women’s bodies during childbirth and early postpartum. In a third line of inquiry (Chapter Five), I outline how the current organization of “high-risk” maternity care that is delivered by specialists and is located in regional hospitals has particular implications for women’s pregnancy and motherhood experiences, especially for women who live at a distance from these services and/or find it challenging to attend appointments because of employment and familial responsibilities. This analysis shows how the discourses of “risk” and “safety” are differently known and enacted by women and their healthcare providers, and calls into question the classification of pregnancies of women living with HIV as “high-risk.” In following the three threads and tracking the territory of perinatal care for women living with HIV, I illuminate points of disjuncture between women’s and healthcare providers’ ways of knowing HIV in the context of pregnancy and childbirth, and identify possibilities for how healthcare practices can be augmented to respond to the concerns and challenge that women expressed. In the Conclusion chapter, I draw attention to the tensions between the meta-level ideological discourses of “HIV exceptionalism” and “HIV normalization” that run through Chapters Three, Four, and Five, and that are generalized across the HIV and maternity care services that women living with HIV encounter. I end this dissertation with my thoughts regarding implications for the organization of perinatal care for women living with HIV in Ontario.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,846
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,970

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0310,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMacSphere (McMaster University)Même sujetQualitative Research Methods and EthicsTravaux en français237 207