MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7115818306

Assessing developmental predictions of life history theory in psychology using census data

2025· dissertation· en· W7115818306 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHarshnessPsychosocialCensusPopulationIndigenousTimelineLife course approachLongitudinal study
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Life history theory in psychology (LHT-P) posits that early harshness and unpredictability levels influence one’s life history strategy (LHS), a suit of traits and developmental milestones that can include reproduction, risky behaviour, aggression and violence, attachment, and more. Perhaps the strongest association studied is that proposed by psychosocial acceleration theory (PAT), which predicts that higher levels of harshness and unpredictability (especially father absence) is associated with earlier puberty and sexual debut, especially in females. However, recent criticisms have questioned whether LHS differs across humans, whether PAT’s assumptions are exaggerated, and whether any observed association is causal. Surprisingly, country-wide populational studies testing LHT-P and PAT’s assumptions, especially studies using longitudinal designs, are lacking. This dissertation used a mix of exploratory and confirmatory analytical approaches to determine if harshness and unpredictability early in life predict earlier and frequent reproduction using publicly available governmental data from the Brazilian Census, the American Community Survey, the Canadian Census and other Statistics Canada sources. We separated predictors and outcomes by 10 to 15 years across the different studies and tested models using cross-sectional and inverted timeline (i.e., harshness and unpredictability “predicting” earlier reproduction) methods. We used five geographic levels to assess predictions: Brazilian municipalities, US counties, and Canadian dissemination areas, census divisions, and provinces and territories. We also tested whether the proportion of visible minorities (i.e., Brazilian Black population, American Black and Hispanic or Latino population, and Canadian visible minorities and Indigenous population) are significant predictors of earlier and frequent reproduction. Results from Chapter 3 suggest that the proportion of the population that lacks resources, has bigger family sizes, and are young married mothers in Brazil predicted the proportion of young mothers and percentage of children 10 years later. We observed a similar finding in US counties data with a 14-year separation between predictors and outcomes. The percentage of Blacks in Brazil was not a significant predictor, but percentage of Blacks and of Hispanic or Latino in US populations was a negative and significant predictor of frequent reproduction. Chapter 4 showed that census divisions data yielded better results than dissemination areas, which indicates that geographical and populational stability results in a better model performance than larger sample sizes. The prevalence of children in low-income families and the percentage of children predict family size of one-parent families and more frequent reproduction 15 years later. However, contrary to LHT-P assumptions, higher unemployment and higher rents relative to income were predictive of smaller family size of one-parent families and less frequent reproduction. The proportion of Indigenous people was also predictive family size of one-parent families. The longitudinal model performed better than the model with reversed timeline. Results from Chapter 5 show that the interaction between the proportion of Indigenous people and the cost of living to income ratio was also predictive of earlier and more frequent reproduction in Canadian provinces and territories 15 years later, but the main effect of the proportion of Indigenous people was negatively associated with earlier and frequent reproduction. Overall, the analyses of population data support some assumptions of LHT-P and PAT literature, and suggest that visible minorities, especially in US and Canada, probably encounter sources of harshness and unpredictability that are generally not captured in LHT-P literature. Therefore, future studies could explore new measures of harshness and unpredictability to these different sources of environmental harshness and unpredictability to fully characterize environments experienced by visible minorities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,081
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,162

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,079
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,111
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMacSphere (McMaster University)Même sujetEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorTravaux en français237 207