Rainbow Community of Practice: Supporting Nurse Practitioners caring for 2SLGBTQ clients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aim: This study examines the learning needs of nurse practitioners (NPs) related to Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (2SLGBTQ) healthcare and evaluates the efficacy of a one-day conference on transgender health care to address the identified knowledge gaps for NPs. Background: 2SLGBTQ individuals continue to experience barriers when accessing healthcare. A lack of education about 2SLGBTQ healthcare needs has been identified as a barrier to NPs providing inclusive care to this population. The Rainbow NP community of practice was developed as a forum for sharing expertise about 2SLGBTQ healthcare, while providing safe space to ask questions, share resources and network. To understand the learning needs of NPs about 2SLGBTQ health, a survey was developed by the community of practice and sent to all members of the Nurse Practitioner Association of Ontario. Results from that survey informed the development of a one-day professional development conference on transgender health. Methods: This study utilized secondary analysis of two quantitative questionnaires. The first questionnaire examined NPs learning needs related to providing care to 2SLGBTQ clients, and the second questionnaire evaluated the effectiveness of the one-day conference on transgender health. Study participants included members of the Nurse Practitioner Association of Ontario and attendees of the one-day conference. Findings: Sixty-six member surveys (response rate 4.5%) were returned. Results showed that 74% of NPs surveyed felt their clinical practice setting was 2SLGBTQ friendly. The majority of participants reported they were comfortable or somewhat comfortable providing care to a transgender individual, however almost a third of NPs surveyed were not comfortable providing care to transgender clients. Forty-three conference participants completed the second survey (response rate 54%). The majority of participants rated the conference as excellent (84%). Four themes emerged from the feedback: clinical pearls; the patient voice; focus on transgender care; and the NP lens. Conclusion: Supporting NPs to provide care to transgender individuals is an important way to improve care to this population. Professional development opportunities for NPs to enhance their knowledge and capacity in caring for the 2SLGBTQ population were well received and much needed. Developing a community of practice is a way to support NPs, allow for professional development opportunities and to share knowledge with the broader NP community.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».