Refugee health – collaborating for better outcomes
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Refugee health is a topical and important issue.Although psychological issues are well described, and refugees from certain regions are at risk of a range of infectious diseases, many people from refugee backgrounds also experience chronic physical diseases and/or live with a disability. 1 Their health status has evolved in the context of organised violence marked by persecution, forced exile from their homelands, and grief and loss at many levels.Resettlement in a new country has its own challenges, often prolonged. 2here are some differences between the needs of asylum seekers and those of refugees who enter Australia as part of its humanitarian migration program.However, asylum seekers and refugees share many common concerns, especially long-term conditions such as psychological distress associated with their experiences and the uncertainty of life in Australia. 3Ngo and colleagues explore the detection rates for health conditions screened after arrival in Australia, and the importance of tailoring screening to refugees' migration history and risk.This is especially important for refugees from Middle Eastern countries such as Syria, whose risk profile is different to those from traditional refugee source countries.Despite the politics in Australia, there is genuine goodwill and concern to ensure that people from refugee backgrounds get the care and support they need.However, realising this objective is challenging.One major reason is the fragmentation that can occur between specialised refugee services and mainstream, public and nongovernment health and welfare services.Over time, this can create discontinuities that may lead to refugees' health and social needs being overlooked and neglected.Because of their lower health literacy, refugees are especially vulnerable to these gaps.Key requirements for better integrated care include good professional relationships between providers, effective communication and sharing of information, and clear and supported pathways between services.This issue of Public Health Research & Practice contains examples of where this integration works at the international level.Martin and Douglas describe the international cooperation involved in premigration screening, especially between the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.Pottie and colleagues illustrate the high level of collaboration between government, nongovernment, private and professional organisations in Canada in providing primary care for refugees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,041 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle