Zur Dresdner Armbrustmacherfamilie Hänisch und ihren „Zunftgenossen“
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The craft of the crossbow makers is shrouded in mystery. Today copyists fail in the attempt to achieve the quality of the old originals. The members of the Dresden Hänisch family were famous representatives of this profession. Since the 16th century they served as crossbow makers for the Electors and Kings of Saxony. For example Johann Gottfried Hänisch the Elder (1696 - 1778) was employed by Augustus the Strong. His signature was „IGH“. In the 64th Hermann Historica auction a crossbow (lot no. 2465) was sold, which is very meaningful in terms of the family tradition of Haenisch. This weapon with its „IGH“ signature apparently was made in the first quarter of the 18th century (fig. 1, 2). It shows features that appear also on Hänisch-crossbows of later production. These are the gilded bridle and the green pompons (their colors refered to the Wettin arms) and the grotesque masks around the channels for the pricker on the top and at the bottom of the tiller. A special feature of the above mentioned crossbow is that its decorative design refers to at least 100 years earlier forms. So this Baroque crossbow documents a family tradition in an unique way. Johann Friedrich Hänisch the Younger (1780 - 1836) was a grandson of the well-known Johann Gottfried Hänisch. He learned the profession of a gunsmith in his native town and served for the Saxon rulers. He was responsible for the care of the weapons of the Royal Arms Gallery, among them the crossbows. He died on 15th December 1836 in Dresden. The inventory of his estate gives an impression of the tools which were necessary for his craft. For comparison also the workshop inventory of the Leipzig crossbow maker Johann Heinrich Oelckers (1767 or 1768 - 1827) is cited in the article and one of his crossbows is depicted on fig. 3. After the inventory he could craft new crossbows completely. He was able to forge steelbows, to make tillers, locks, strings, bolts and so on. His successor, also from Leipzig, was Ferdinand Tell (1798 – 1863). In his letters he mentioned the adjusting procedure of crossbows. The same is to see on fig. 4, where the crossbow maker Oechslin from Schaffhausen is shooting an old crossbow in 1874. Ferdinand Tells rival was Johann Friedrich Rothe (1802 – 1833) from Leipzig. Beside strings and others Rothe offered bows of refined steel. Tell and Rothe were learnt wood turners and mechanics. They also traded with old crossbows. The craft of crossbow makers was free and in the German speaking countries apparently crossbow maker guilds didn't exist after the late Middle Ages. In the article some examples are given for craftsmen of other professions like smithes and textil-workers, who served as crossbowmakers in the 18th century. One example is the gunmaker Georg Friedrich Wolff in Freiberg/Saxony, who made a crossbow („Schnepper“) in late Baroque style (fig. 5).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,060 | 0,054 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».