Towards fostering lifelong learning in engineering programs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Faced with the challenge of measuring whether our students are prepared to develop their own lifelong learning journey, the University of New Brunswick's Faculty of Engineering (FoE) created a four-part Engineering Profession Lecture Series. In these courses, instructors prepare 13 lectures per term and students must attend at least ten, with and option of up to two of those ten being replaced by the Association of Professional Engineers & Geoscientists of New Brunswick (APEGNB) Professional Development Hours (PDH).The first two courses take place in the first two terms for all engineering degrees at UNB. They focus on study and well-being skills, the engineering profession, and the engineering code of ethics. These courses also provide engineering students in the common core with information to help them select one of the nine engineering disciplines offered at UNB.The senior versions cover diverse topics and serve as PDH for students, faculty, and members of the APEGNB. These lectures cover key graduate attributes required for accreditation by Engineers Canada such as professionalism, ethics, sustainability, and accessibility with the primary goal of fostering lifelong learning among graduating students.Here, the focus is on the senior series prepared for provincial association members, including members of the FoE, to earn PDH credits. As instructors, we are tasked with securing 26 quality speakers throughout the academic year. This academic year, nearly three quarters of the presentations came from UNB's external partners.The lecture series benefits for our students are multiple: it highlights the importance of maintaining professional engineering status through continued professional development, and fosters a closer relationship between association members, the FoE, and our undergraduate students. For APEGNB members, the lecture series provides a source of free PDH at a regular evening schedule, and fosters collaboration with graduating students.Moving forward, we foresee the following challenges: ensuring topic and presenter diversity to appeal to APEGNB colleagues, maintaining the high quality of a weekly engineering profession lecture series, and securing resources to attract high-profile speakers. Fortunately, the FoE supports the series by providing financial resources including two teaching resources, and dedicating part of our engineering partnership coordinator's time to contact potential guest speakers.Given that all professional associations in Canada track PDH credits, developing the life-long learning habit in graduating students is imperative. Although implementing a seminar series can be resource intensive, the benefits for the students and the profession are significant, regardless of the jurisdiction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».